We would just as soon never hear the phrase “Cherry Crush” again
It won’t quite make up for the social security death-gap, but knowing that Tom Wolfe AND Zane can get smacked down for narsty sex-chatter means at least the wet part of Martin Luther King’s dream endures:
Zane’s popularity rests in her total lack of taint. People want to read about sex almost as much as they want to watch it and have it, and if they can do so without appearing to be reading something smutty, all the better. I understand that maybe critics and readers were looking for an alternative to “glistening, blooming flowers” and “pulsating members,” but Zane’s novel is crude and unimaginative writing masquerading as urban erotica. There has to be better smut out there.
Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ Friday, February 11, 2005 1:24 pm | | Comments (3)












It’s not clear why Random House threw 















Welcome to ‘Fine Lines’, the Friday feature in which we give a sentimental, sometimes-critical, far more wrinkled look at the children’s and YA books we loved in our youth.














A story that rides on its own melting also runs the risk of dissolving entirely. In William Henry Lewis’s second collection of short fiction — his first, ”In the Arms of Our Elders,” was published by Carolina Wren Press a decade ago — the slow, lyric stories of love, loss and longing have a sensuous appeal, but they often threaten to disappear into the ether before they get off the ground.






Is “lack of taint” a medical condition?
Comment by Jimmy Beck — 2/11/2005 @ 3:17 pm
If it is, they probably have a support group. I’d like to sit in one of their meetings — they’d probably have some interesting chairs.
Comment by rasputin — 2/11/2005 @ 3:55 pm
That reminds me — do Sexaholics Anonymous meetings really properly exist any more, or are they generally accepted to be a place to pick up easy chicks?
Comment by Nick Douglas — 2/13/2005 @ 2:30 am