It must have been a toss-up between “Cutting Edge” and “The Scalpel Life”
Not since the PC craze of the late 1980s and the launch of PC Resources magazine has a publication had such a promising start, says Husni. Naturally, he says, a debut of this magnitude begs the question: Can this trend sustain itself?
We’re just going to put our fingers in our ears and hum da da da da da over the topic of this article and state, once again, for the grammatical record, “begs the question” does not mean “raises the question” but instead means AVOIDS THE QUESTION, as in, beggars the question, as in LEAVES IT UNASKED (in this case, unfortunately, not “nonexistent.”)
Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ Friday, February 11, 2005 11:43 am | | Comments (3)











It’s not clear why Random House threw 




It’s difficult to pinpoint the exact moment one achieves literary success, but when Stephen King picks up the phone to interrupt your Good Morning America appearance to personally thank you for writing your latest book, you know you are in the ballpark.
It might seem odd to describe a novel that involves barfing in cars, stalking boys and a drunk dad playing beer pong in his underpants as heartwarming, but Beach Week author Susan Coll is a master at finding wisdom in the unexpected.





Remaking society can take decades. But global rebellion is short work for sharpshooter Katniss Everdeen, who single-handedly foments a revolution in Suzanne Collins’ blockbuster young-adult Hunger Games trilogy. America likes its champions reluctant, and Collins specializes in that surly breed: her heroine trounces dystopic despots while chewing her cheek in self-doubt.






I live in Jersey City, about as far from a Betty Draper’s magnolia petal-overlaid redoubt as you can get. But every morning, I am mildly taken aback when I find myself marching among a troop that is entirely female, women of my age and station, ranging from the harried to the glamorous, all pushing one or two offspring toward the park in an assortment of urban-optimized carriages. Really? I think.
Jonathan Safran Foer has a son. He’s not the Son, I don’t think, although I might be forgiven for doing so. Because even though it is generally agreed that we are living in a child-centered moment, Eating Animals, the Everything Is Illuminated author’s somewhat reheated contribution to the recent spate of ruminations on flesh eating (verdict: don’t), is a singular entry in the annals of parenting literature—bypassing a now-commonplace obsession with one’s offspring to head straight to sanctification.












Welcome to ‘Fine Lines’, the Friday feature in which we give a sentimental, sometimes-critical, far more wrinkled look at the children’s and YA books we loved in our youth.












A story that rides on its own melting also runs the risk of dissolving entirely. In William Henry Lewis’s second collection of short fiction — his first, ”In the Arms of Our Elders,” was published by Carolina Wren Press a decade ago — the slow, lyric stories of love, loss and longing have a sensuous appeal, but they often threaten to disappear into the ether before they get off the ground.





According to my Meriam-Webster Dictionary of English Usage, the phrase “beg the question” actually describes a logical error in which someone arguing the truth of one proposition (for example, “locusts are bad”) instead argues another, in a way that assumes the first proposition has already been settled (e.g. “locusts must be eradicated”). The Latin term for this error is petitio principii, traditionally translated in English as “begging the question.” So dodging the issue is the result of begging the question, but not the very act of begging it.
It follows that the definition of “begging the question” as “sidestepping, evading,” is itself a bastardization of the original meaning.
But I most emphatically do not agree with the editor of the dictionary when he writes that people who miss this distinction are “untrained in the finer points of logical argument.” That is an inexcusable slander.
Happy Valentine’s Day!
Comment by Chris — 2/15/2005 @ 1:17 am
Why are my comments not forwarding to my Neomail suddenly? THAT is inexcusable.
Next time, Chris, chocolates. Then some dictionary reading, if you desire.
Comment by Old Hag — 2/16/2005 @ 12:09 am
Btw, as any woman will tell you, a man acting on the premise that a question is already settled and a man deliberately dodging a question are indistinguishable.
Comment by Old Hag — 2/16/2005 @ 12:24 am