Avast, me hearties!
Today I’m pirating (I mean, guest-blogging) the lovely Old Hag. In a brave and glorious act of self-promotion (though maybe if I do this often enough, I’ll also inspire Lizzie to post more often again. We miss you, Old Hag!)
And because Lizzie is a clever fancypants (don’t even try to deny it!) and because I assume her readers are also clever, and wearers of pants that are fancy, I thought I might take this opportunity to ask you all what you think of children’s books?
Because the entire (shameless pirate-hussy that I am) reason for my visit is that I’ve just published my first book for kids, Up and Down the Scratchy Mountains, and I’m finding I have a complicated relationship with becoming a children’s author. As opposed to being a “writer” or a “poet” or a “waitress” for that matter.
Not because I don’t think it totally rocks to write for kids. IT TOTALLY ROCKS! But because I feel these silly twinges when I head out into the world of clever pants.
Maybe my issues stem from the fact that a lot of MFA programs won’t count children’s books toward tenure (and I am, for better or for worse, a product of that world). Maybe my problems arise from being told by Yaddo that they cannot fund the writing of children’s books, no matter how good or literary. Maybe it’s the lack of children’s coverage in newspapers. Maybe it’s just that poets I know insist on referring to children’s books as “genre.”
But whatever the case, I’m steamed.
And I thought that maybe I could ask you what you think…
What say you? Are children’s books literary? If you meet someone at a party, and they tell you they are an author, and then you find out they write for kids, does that change the way you think about them as writers?
Tell me the truth? Or spank me and send me to bed!
And maybe… either way… when your cousin’s kid has a birthday, or your friend-with-a-baby invites you over for dinner…
You’ll buy my book!
Posted by laurel in General @ Thursday, August 28, 2008 8:43 pm | Tags: guest blog, laurel snyder, piracy, shameless hussy, up and down the scratchy mountains, wanton acts | Comments (8)











It’s not clear why Random House threw 




It’s difficult to pinpoint the exact moment one achieves literary success, but when Stephen King picks up the phone to interrupt your Good Morning America appearance to personally thank you for writing your latest book, you know you are in the ballpark.
It might seem odd to describe a novel that involves barfing in cars, stalking boys and a drunk dad playing beer pong in his underpants as heartwarming, but Beach Week author Susan Coll is a master at finding wisdom in the unexpected.





Remaking society can take decades. But global rebellion is short work for sharpshooter Katniss Everdeen, who single-handedly foments a revolution in Suzanne Collins’ blockbuster young-adult Hunger Games trilogy. America likes its champions reluctant, and Collins specializes in that surly breed: her heroine trounces dystopic despots while chewing her cheek in self-doubt.






I live in Jersey City, about as far from a Betty Draper’s magnolia petal-overlaid redoubt as you can get. But every morning, I am mildly taken aback when I find myself marching among a troop that is entirely female, women of my age and station, ranging from the harried to the glamorous, all pushing one or two offspring toward the park in an assortment of urban-optimized carriages. Really? I think.
Jonathan Safran Foer has a son. He’s not the Son, I don’t think, although I might be forgiven for doing so. Because even though it is generally agreed that we are living in a child-centered moment, Eating Animals, the Everything Is Illuminated author’s somewhat reheated contribution to the recent spate of ruminations on flesh eating (verdict: don’t), is a singular entry in the annals of parenting literature—bypassing a now-commonplace obsession with one’s offspring to head straight to sanctification.












Welcome to ‘Fine Lines’, the Friday feature in which we give a sentimental, sometimes-critical, far more wrinkled look at the children’s and YA books we loved in our youth.












A story that rides on its own melting also runs the risk of dissolving entirely. In William Henry Lewis’s second collection of short fiction — his first, ”In the Arms of Our Elders,” was published by Carolina Wren Press a decade ago — the slow, lyric stories of love, loss and longing have a sensuous appeal, but they often threaten to disappear into the ether before they get off the ground.






Hi Laurel,
I was thinking about this recently having just read Francine Prose’s new novel. My thoughts here: http://picklemethis.blogspot.com/2008/08/goldengrove-by-francine-prose.html
In short being that children’s books are no less literary than adult books, but they are *different*, as they should be. And to fail to acknowledge that difference (as marketing depts sometimes seem to do)isn’t fair to the book, its writer, or its readers.
Which is not to say that adults can’t enjoy kids’ books, of course. I am certainly looking forward to yours.
Comment by Kerry Clare — 8/28/2008 @ 9:43 pm
Roald Dahl wrote about the authoring of Children’s Books in an introduction to a book of ghost stories that he had compiled — he had very strong opinions on the matter, and believed that kids’ books were a serious matter, and that women were usually the best writers of said fiction. He also believed that women had an edge on men in the scary story field, too!
Not that a man’s opinion should be the “be all end all” point in the matter, but I tend to agree. If I were invited to a cocktail party and found out that someone wrote kids’ books, I would probably embarrass myself, the author, and my date by fan-girling out.
Comment by Nina — 8/29/2008 @ 10:39 am
I absolutely agree children’s books can be “literature.” I have read numerous children’s books to my own children that had themes of self discovery, an individuals place in community and many more. If anyone doubts the validity of Young Adult Lit I recommend they read Lois Lowry’s “The Giver”. This is my favorite book of all time. I use to use it in my 9th grade English classroom and we would have the most wonderful discussions about an individual’s power in society, e.g. what would our lives be like if we were assigned spouses instead of choosing our own? Many a kid who came from a broken home thought this might be a better way to go.
When my 60-something father came out to visit me a couple of years ago he asked for a book he could read while he stayed at my house. I gave him “The Giver”. Not only did he read it and enjoy it, he went out and bought his own copy and convinced his book club to read it. Needless to say a great discussion was had by all!
Comment by zcalgal — 8/30/2008 @ 4:20 pm
If I found out a fellow party guest wrote children’s literature I would probably be far more excited than if I found out they wrote an “adult” novel.
I honestly feel that the bar for children’s fiction is higher than for “adult” literature. How many times have you met a published novelist or poet whose work you hated? But I’ve never met anyone who worked for a children’s format (books, television) whose work I didn’t have massive respect for.
Comment by Nathalie — 9/1/2008 @ 10:17 am
*squeal*
I really did let out a little squeal when I found your site. Umm, can I just say, Little slice of heaven for those who suffer book lust.
I liked your site so much I highlighted you, on my Katie’s Calamities blog, as ‘new to me’. Come on over and take a peek..
TTFN,
Katie
Comment by Katie — 9/19/2008 @ 1:51 pm
Alice in wonderland, Through the looking glass…
Lewis Carroll.
Rudyard Kipling.
Enid Blyton.
Yes “IT TOTALLY ROCKS!”
Comment by codger — 9/24/2008 @ 2:00 am
If you can’t remember all the way back to how books affected you as a kid (which would be weird actually), then once you have kids, you really, really realize that some books are great and literary and some are lame and dumb. Some hold my attention and theirs and some don’t. For those that do, the attraction is immediate and real and strikes at the core of what makes books good– the language is interesting, the characters or fish or dogs make provocative choices and the themes resonate without coming across as “themes.” So yes, if I met you at a cocktail party I would be way impressed–if I liked your book, just as I would be for any other author whose work I admire. (Sorry, haven’t read your book…)
Comment by Melissa Johnson — 9/27/2008 @ 12:40 pm
I personally think that good childrens’ literature is every bit as *literary* as “adult” literature. More so, even. I mean when you write a book with 100 words or less, and make it good, your words choice has to be perfect.
Examples: Maurice Sendak, Patricia Polacco, Audrey Wood….
Beautiful writing is always to be appreciated.
That said, there is a good deal of sappy garbage published that makes me wince when my children bring it home from the school library and ask me to read it to them.
Comment by Rebecca — 10/13/2008 @ 10:44 pm