If you don’t watch “Lost”, read no further, but…
…I would just like to submit that I am of the opinion tonight’s episode will reveal the show is all about FATHERHOOD, which has been dimly hinted in the cases of Jin and Claire, but this theme is actually also about the OLDER PEOPLE FOR REELS and that the wayward children of Jack, Locke and that weird black-haired guy make up the crew that is supposed to save the island, they are brought together because they are a FAMILY, that someone is Kate’s dad in that crew, that that weird black-haired guy was annoyed at Locke for choosing the knife because the knife is JACK’S, as he is the SURGEON, and that Locke is always screwing things up by wanting to be what he is not, that on “Lost”, character is destiny just as on the Sopranos, destiny is character, and I come by all this honestly as when I wrote this, I originally wanted it to be about Sidney’s Russian half-sister who was pretending to be her and of course was not allowed to do this as that wound up being the next SEASON of “Alias”, and that obviously J.J.’s mind and mine are onthesametrack.
Also, “You are not supposed to raise him,” I believe, actually refers to the raising of the dead, not Aaron.
I think the sand is Locke’s because it’s the island, and the compass because he is one of the leaders. I have no idea what that fucking book is.
Oh, Aaron is like the Golden Child of this whole thing or something. Also, Jin’s son somehow, and not only because he is Asian. AND…perhaps the only children that CAN be born on the island are those sired by those original fathers, not mere mortals.
No thoughts on polar bears; thanks for listening.
UPDATE: Also, Jacob fathers THE TWELVE TRIBES OF ISRAEL. Maybe Sun and Jin’s son and Aaron are Moses and Aaron? So much biblicity, so much need for Wikipedia!
Posted by altehaggen in General @ Thursday, May 15, 2008 6:36 pm | Tags: I am an idiot, J.J. Abrams, lost, Remember I wrote "Alias" prequels?, yes | Comments (0)











It’s not clear why Random House threw 




Welcome to ‘Fine Lines’, the Friday feature in which we give a sentimental, sometimes-critical, far more wrinkled look at the children’s and YA books we loved in our youth.














A story that rides on its own melting also runs the risk of dissolving entirely. In William Henry Lewis’s second collection of short fiction — his first, ”In the Arms of Our Elders,” was published by Carolina Wren Press a decade ago — the slow, lyric stories of love, loss and longing have a sensuous appeal, but they often threaten to disappear into the ether before they get off the ground.





