Spooky
Posted by Lizzie on 01/29/07
|
Filed under: blog in the day, Lit-ish | Comments (0)
Posted by Lizzie on 01/29/07
|
Filed under: blog in the day, Lit-ish | Comments (0)
Posted by Lizzie on 01/24/07
Take one or two large onions of any nature and one large lemon. Peel onion and chop roughly. Fill a soup pot up with a few cups of water and deposit same; cut lemon in half, squeeze each half and drop in. Simmer low until water has boiled and onion is translucent-y. Strain; fill mug with remaining liquid. You can put in sugar but that makes you a pussy; smearing pulpy onion on your chest will dispel. Whatever. Drink, and it will make you well.
(We could have just emailed this to the lady in question–but then it wouldn’t also count towards this request. Yes, Liam, it’s a crap recipe, but you didn’t submit a porn haiku.)
Go vote! Otherwise, the Czechs win.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: Moi | Comments (1)
Posted by Lizzie on 01/22/07
The Old Hag is busy. Bizzzeee bizzzeee bizzzeee. But we have so much work we might dieseveral new plans for the site, so we thought we’d take three or four hours and install a poll plugin from the Czech Republic to better assess your needs and desires in the new year. We don’t care that much about your answers; it’s just that we want you to acknowledge HOW AWESOME THIS FREAKING POLL IS IT’S INTEGRATED INTO WORDPRESS WITH AJAX AND EVERYTHING. And, actually, we do care. Your thoughts will have a radical effect on the three or four posts here you see before August.
UPDATE: Okay, you fuckers–more answers to your dreams later, but for now:
![]()
Filed under: polls | Tags: Moi | Comments (22)
Posted by Lizzie on
Just a shortie on something we actually meant to post on a few days ago on Emily Bazelon’s Is There A Post-Abortion Syndrome?–which, upon reading and rereading, we have decided might be more accurately retitled, "Despite the Bulk of Research Proving There Is No Post-Abortion Syndrome, Some Women Are Stupid Enough To Act Like They’ve Got It."*
Our main issue with the piece isn’t with Bazelon’s claims: that the Religious Right is attempting to swing the ambivalent middle in the abortion debate who still focus on the woman by presenting the woman as the second victim in the affair, and that anti-abortion activists are attempting to swing credulous women to believe they have been harmed after the fact. But we find the patronizing rhetorical treatment of Rhonda Arias, an abortion-recovery counselor and the main subject of the piece, absolutely maddening–worse, actually, since Bazelon’s firm yet detached tone masks a very real bias. Not against the anti-abortion guard, but against the subject herself. We’ll just run through some of the examples:
1. She was beginning the 50-mile drive from her house in southwest Houston to Plane State Jail, where she is, as she puts it, an “abortion-recovery counselor.”
Why are these quotes here? Is Arias the only one who puts it that way? Doubtful. Is it a self-sneering construction? Not necessarily. Sneerer, sneer thyself–let the reader decide if it needs quotes or not.
2. After what she describes as a revelation from God, she decided that her own pain and unhappiness were rooted in the abortion she had in 1973, when she was 19.
This is minor, but "decided" introduces this note of preposterousness into the claim. What the hell does that mean, to ‘decide’, when pain and unhappiness either are or aren’t caused by a particular event? And if Bazelon’s claiming our grasp on what causes us pain is by definition is hazy, Arias certainly is not the only one guilty of misfiring.
By the way, "revelation from God" might have occasioned a more appropriate use of quotes, since it actually is one.
3. Arias said she woke up from the anesthesia to the certain knowledge that she had killed her child. Because of this knowledge, she is now equally certain, she slipped into years of depression, drinking and freebasing cocaine.
Again, you know, you can think it’s a child or not–but being pro-choice just means no one else gets to legislate about their beliefs in that regard, not that people are not free to consider what they’ve got children at any point. These two instances of "certain" place an ambiguity over what Arias does believe–which she’s perfectly free to. Read the sentence this way: Arias said she woke up from the anesthesia knowing that she had killed her child. Because of this knowledge, she slipped into years of depression, drinking and freebasing cocaine. It is a little jarring for those of us who don’t think of fetuses as children, or who deny an abortion could be completely responsible for such a spiral. But I don’t think it’s appropriate for the reporter to insert a signifier that the opposite is perforce true.
4. In her mind, all of her troubles — the drugs, the suicide attempt, the third and fourth abortions she went on to have, the wrestling match of a marriage she eventually entered — are the aftermath of her own original sin, the 1973 abortion.
Again, "In her mind"….what about just "Arias believes" or, God forbid, "Arias says"?
5. For Arias, however, abortion is an act she can atone for. And this makes it different from the many other sources of anguish in her past. As a child, she was sexually abused by her stepbrother, she told me. An older boy forced her to have sex when she was 14; seven months later, she says, she woke in the middle of the night to wrenching cramps and gave birth to a baby girl who was placed for adoption. A year later, Arias’s father, a bricklayer to whom she was close, plummeted from several stories of scaffolding to his death. She left home and fell out of touch with her mother and two brothers. By concentrating on the babies she feels she has lost (she has named the first two Adam and Jason), Arias has drained other aching memories of some of their power.
6. I’m sorry…did I miss the part where Bazelon was Arias’s psychiatrist…for several years? Not only is it inappropriate to assert — to be certain, let’s say — what’s causing someone pain (so, Bazelon, rape gets, like, a 10, and abortion’s a 1.5), babies she feels she has lost approaches the obnoxious. Arias is perfectly within her rights to think they’re babies, and that she’s lost them. She’s also perfectly within her rights to look at her life and know that it’s the worst thing that’s ever happened to her.
7. The idea that abortion is at the root of women’s psychological ills is not supported by the bulk of the research. Instead, the scientific evidence strongly shows that abortion does not increase the risk of depression, drug abuse or any other psychological problem any more than having an unwanted pregnancy or giving birth. [NB: this quote is not in order]
Whew! Take that, Arias. You’re not supported by the bulk of scientific research.
8. “You have well-meaning therapists or political crusaders, paired with women who are troubled and experiencing a variety of vague symptoms,” Brenda Major, the U.C. Santa Barbara psychology professor, explained to me. “The therapists and crusaders offer a diagnosis that gives meaning to the symptoms, and that gives the women a way to repent. You can’t repent depressive symptoms. But you can repent an action.” You can repent an abortion. You can reach for a narrative of sin and atonement, of perfect imagined babies waiting in heaven.
Since none of the therapists here have seen any of the women in question, we’re not sure we can give this assessment any more authority than those Us Magazine features where they read the body language of celebrity couples and predict who’s breaking up.
We don’t want to go overboard on this–it’s a good article laying out some very current trends that it’s good to keep an eye on, and Bazelon does give a sizable head-nod to the idea (see? There we go again) that women can, of course, feel long-term pain from abortions. But here’s our question: why is Arias treated like there’s no way she could possibly be one of those women? Why are all her statements qualified, while everyone else in the article pretty much gets a bland "says" and "told me"? Because she’s not a pro-choice woman who knows it’s just a blastocyst but nevertheless is having a hard time? Because Bazelon is pretty sure other events in her life must be more painful? Emotional harm is a tricky thing to assess in strangers, and it’s an even trickier thing to legislate. If the idea of legislating by personal affidavit on abortion is preposterous, we should throw out the idea of legislating by emotion at all, not throw up longitudinal studies that counter the percentage of harm others are claiming. You can’t negate one person’s experience with "the bulk of research"–abortion is not global warming.
Anyway, ideas and thoughts welcome.
*We’ll just insert a standard liberal disclaimer before anyone decides the Catholic Church has hijacked this blog. Of course we’re rabidly pro-choice (stop reading the post right now! We’ll support you!), and we’re also strongly of the opinion that the Religious Right’s new-ish tack of claiming abortion should be outlawed because it ‘hurts’ women is a terrible development (*sputter* after numerous minor surgeries many patients require Prozac for the resulting depression; do we question those surgeries? *sputter*). We also support Bazelon’s longtime project of debunking spurious claims that threaten to hijack the culture and strip citizens of basic rights. Stop sputtering, you.
Filed under: General | Comments (1)
Posted by Lizzie on
We would like to force you all to take a poll, but WordPress isn’t allowing us to embed javascript, whatever that means. Ideas? Knowledge? Please direct to our inbox.
Filed under: General | Comments (0)
Posted by Lizzie on 01/21/07
Those of you that ever pay ANY attention to what we do may recall a year or two or so ago–we’re over thirty now; who cares anymore–our trying to get together something called "Teaser" that would print first chapters from forthcoming works. We did, like, two before we were informed that Pride & Prejudice needed repeated watching. Though we still maintain our very wonderful teasers will whup any kind of behind, Five Chapters is attending a little more diligently to a similar project–in a weekly fashion, yet! At this brilliantly simple site, one story is serialized over a work week; a new author arrives each Monday. This week is J. Robert Lennon; you can check out the archives here. (They include Thisbe Nissen, Anthony Swofford and Vendela Vida, just to start.) We actually have a very hard time reading print online (we know, we know, a vegetarian butcher), so we hope the wonderful editor, David Daley, considers adjusting the grayscale text for us old folkspeople who need glasses. The "Print" function is a start–maybe consider a formatted downloadable PDF, or, we don’t know, something with a pretty cover we could buy in a store? Whatever. Live it up, you twentysomething bastards.
Filed under: Lit-ish, Teaser | Comments (4)
Posted by Lizzie on 01/18/07
For reasons that may or may not ever become clear to you–not that we give a crap–we’re finally publishing a poem on our blog that also remains on permanent loan to our dearest friend Mr. Balk, as long as he wants it. (No, Alex did not make the poem up to make fun of us. He is much funnier than that.) We wrote this many years ago in college for a friend who was being dicked over by an evil, unkind mana 26-year-old. That man is now a dutiful, loving husband and father. See the power of poetry? Especially when it RHYMES?
There’s a jump in here for the old folks. Don’t jump, old folksThe "jump" function is missing from our WYSIWYG for some reason. You’re going to have to get THE WHOLE THING AT ONCE! (Rimshot! We love saying "Rimshot!".) If you are related to us, do not read past stanza 4. Everyone else–we don’t know why you even read this blog in the first place, so whatever.
Ballad Of The Love-Scorned Anywoman
Would it trouble you, at my behest,
to put a stuttering heart to rest?
This trouble’s neither great nor tall–
So look at me, at least, or call.
My number’s listed in the book,
and much is said with scattered look,
or not. Not operating, then
fling out that stevedore, and pen
a captive letter, deeply felt,
as lush and fired as African veldt.
God’s love, we never had a fight!
We Walked in Beauty like the Night!
or somesuch. As you used to say?
perhaps that was another day.
Perhaps you listed me along
with All Else In My Life That’s Wrong:
the idling sound that’s not quite sound,
the ruined roast, the basset hound
you wanted but never seemed to get.
And you had studied to be a vet!
Perhaps I’m left in flounced heap
with all else limitless and cheap.
Or backyard flung to sootwashed bin,
with other snot-strung cherubim.
But I digress, and I’m forlorn.
My hands are weeping, chewed-off, torn.
I’d send them to The One I Love,
If Hallmark made a helpful glove.
My needs are drippy, short and clear:
could you last lilt out, "My Dear?"
Can’t do? Be kind, if we’re to be free.
I sucked your dick; be nice to me.
Filed under: poesie, Sex-ish | Tags: Moi | Comments (2)
Posted by Lizzie on
Woof. This terrible news gave us a little punch in our gut, though we wouldn’t have expected it. Our first "real" job (in god-DAMN 1995 you’ve got to be kidding me) was not at Time Inc. but at Time Warner’s Book-of-the-Month Club, on the second floor, layered with all of Time Inc.’s magazines, back in the days when they’d just instituted the policy of handing out free copies of People and EW to the whole joint before each issue dropped.
Once, during, the Turner deal, we blew into the building our usual 45 minutes late for work and jumped into what we thought was an empty elevator, hit the button, and then the skin on the back of our neck prickled. As we got off and, like Eurydice in cheap Club Monaco pants, looked back, there was a 4-feet-tall Ted Turner, totally laughing at the girl who had literally jumped onto an elevator with him, surrounded by eighty body guards. Viva la mid-90s!
Also, we met Dick Parsons. Like all corporate titans, he is incredibly charismatic and charming. He came to speak to all 79 of the black people at Time Warner, and was, like, an hour and fifteen minutes late. But if you’re going to be late, you want it to be to see black people. Most of us had only gotten there ten minutes before.
Filed under: General | Comments (2)
Posted by Lizzie on 01/16/07
If you are not a) a New Yorker, b) a girl, c) someone who cares about jeans, or d) someone who cares about jeans, New York, girls, or caring, simply skip this post. But if you ARE, we must take one moment to sub-blog and inform you of the wonders of this Court Street store, where we witnessed not one but FIVE miracles today, FIVE, viz. our trying on five pairs of jeans–yes, ladies, five pairs–all of which not only fit, but were also two sizes too small, and LOOKED GOOD. It’s like a goddamned bizarro-world J. Crew flagship store. We kept thinking of the scene in The Lion, the Witch and The Wardrobe wherein Edmund, seduced by the White Witch, keeps eating Turkish delight and never gets full, not realizing his actions are complicit in imposing a permanent winter over the land. We are totally okay if Aslan or Atlantic Yards or the world or whatever has to get sacrificed over this.
Go ye forth, try on some jeans, and witness the wonders for yourself. Just don’t buy that red dress; we can’t decide if we want it.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: Brooklyn, Moi | Comments (0)
Posted by Lizzie on
It has been a long time, Slate. A long goddamned time! But finally, a goodie from Daniel Bosch:
Would this be ambience, or atmosphere?
Fear.
I hadn’t expected such an emptiness!
An empty nest.
Do you open up before or after a good pandering?
During.
Book, Web site, infomercial. Edginess must be catching.
Ka-ching!
So let me be the first to congratulate—
Too late.
What is it people seek in your utterances?
Other answers.
You knew Mozart. Before he decomposed—
He composed.
And Freud was your plumber. Conscious or unconscious?
Kein Anschluss.
But have you ever crossed over? You know, necrophilia?
Ophelia.
Celebrities! They run to sarcasm.
Our chasm.
How do you do it? I’m already way off course.
Of course.
Read the rest. Also, try this Jennifer Clarvoe…from many years ago.
[Rimshot!]
Filed under: Lit-ish, poesie | Comments (0)
Posted by Lizzie on 01/03/07
We’re a little late on this–lust, sloth, gluttony, etc.–but Boldtype’s Deadly Sins issue is up.
Filed under: General, Lit-ish, Sex-ish | Comments (0)