The Long Arm of the Brothers in Brothers in Brothers in Law

Tired of us talking about teen novels? Allow us to switch into nepotistic mode! The third segment of Pale Force, painstakingly constructed by cartoonist Paul Noth and Hot Pocket-hater Jim Gaffigan, airs tonight (Thursday) on Conan.

Posted by altehaggen in General @ Thursday, April 27, 2006 9:24 am | | Comments (0)

Again, just for the record, we’re INCLUDING ourselves in that “mediocre” in there

Whew! Just to break in, because….uh…..whew! Hot damn.

Apparently we are neither for Kaavya Viswanathan or against her—but we are TOTALLY against teen writers.

Again, whoops. Because we thought we were being called in for one tertiary quote, there, not an ars teenetica. Still, it’s totally the reporter’s prerogative to slant us a little — and WELL done, young man, no offense taken. But to clarify:

1. We didn’t work for 17th street; we worked for GLC, jointly owned by the publisher of 17th Street and the publisher of another successful packager–they were college buddies. (We’re not going to list their names here because we’re sure they’re being bugged enough already; you can Google it and find out pretty easily, if you care.) We were in the offices of 17th Street and did pretty much the same thing they did with different series and projects, took part in editorial meetings, thought up this series title (which everyone HATED and the client LOVED), and unsuccessfully tried to get “Surface Tension” into an SVU title.

2. “A packager basically serves as both the writer and editor of a book,” Skurnick said in a phone interview. “The advantage for a publishing house is they don’t have to do anything — they don’t have to design the book, they don’t have to think about a concept…. They can just say, ‘Here’s $80,000 for twelve of these books.’ They don’t have to do any of the work.” We meant that in a win-win way, not a GODDAMN THOSE FUCKING PUBLISHERS ARE LAZY way.

3. “The picture Skurnick paints of 17th Street and similar packaging firms suggests a contemporary publishing world that has more in common with market-driven, assembly-line industrial production than any traditional notions of the tortured, solitary artist.” Again, not really packager’s fault–or something packagers have exactly, uh, captured the market on, so to speak. Also, tortured artists suck.

4. “How Sweet Valley High came into being,” Skurnick explained to the Indy, “was Francine Pascal came to them with a concept for probably six books, and what was 17th Street Productions at the time — they might have had a different name — sold all six to Random House, and the books took off. What happens to a tremendously popular series like that is that a publisher will renew it, and they’ll renew it for, let’s say, 12 books for that year. But they’ll say, ‘Oh, we want to change it’ — ‘Now they’re in high school,’ or ‘Now they’re going to be witches.’ All sorts of things; whatever keeps them selling.” This is, like, the most haphazard and rambling and semi-incomplete description of packaging, like, ever. Glosses and corrections welcome. And we blame ourselves. And we LIKE things, by the way, that keep selling. And witches.

5. “In my case, I was a former editor at the [17th Street] office where books are farmed out to. But there’s a whole network of writers who mostly do this kind of book,” Skurnick said, referring to scribes who churn out new installments long after a series’ original author has dropped out of the picture. As “work-for-hire” employees with usually no royalty or copyright claims on their output, many of these writers labor with the hopes of gaining the connections that might land them a project of their own. Skurnick explained, “They write books that already exist in series, they pitch series themselves, they pitch standalones, they sort of exist in this netherworld in which they have a relationship with the packager and then, maybe eventually, they’ll have a relationship with the publisher…” Again, we’re not sure this netherworld was a netherworld in a bad way. For some people (=us), writing various books in a series as a side job is HANDY. Working on many levels in the publishing industry simultaneously is handy. Series scribes and series pitchers aren’t pathetic, they’re scrappy. Also, it can be incredibly lucrative. (We have actually always wondered if Ziegesar pitched this series as an employee and, if so, how she managed to retain the damn rights. Anyone with that story, please step forward.)

6. “Because, as Skurnick continued, publishers seeking to maximize earnings on their properties (such as the book rights to television shows like Alias) know exactly where to turn. “The publisher [goes to the packager] and says, ‘You do this, because it’s faster…’ A place like 17th Street really knows what they’re doing with series.”” If we’re not mistaken, we were actually just trying to clarify who had gone to whom in this case, something we don’t know. Packagers sell to publishers, not the other way around. But an agent would certainly be psyched to place a teen book with 17th street, we imagine. There is no way the publisher went to 17th and said “fix this.” But a publisher would conceivably be happy to see a manuscript PITCHED by 17th, starmakers as they are.

Also, the Alias books didn’t have anything to do with 17th–but the editor who worked on other series with 17th got some writers’ names for the series from that connection.

7. “But what about a work like Opal Mehta — a first novel that cannot be openly farmed out to ghostwriters…” So nothing that would ever happen. If a publisher/packager thought the writing was so bad, they’d either work with the author or the book wouldn’t happen. We have rewritten books for series, but that’s ghostwriter writing over ghostwriter—akin to one editor writing over another at a mag in the editing process. Also, it’s completely done openly—as is “ghostwriting”, for that matter. Hence the good old “created by Francine Pascal.”

8. “For her part, Skurnick thinks that the realities of the market, not any malicious plagiarism by Viswanathan, may account for the similarities with Sloppy Firsts and Second Helpings. “They seem like very brief and stupid phrases to copy,” Skurnick said after reading the passages in question. “I’m sure the same phrases are in like 20 teen novels…I think in the case of teen fiction, obviously there are stock characters, there’s a stock plot often, there’s sort of these stock areas — the boy, the body, the family, the friend.”” Again, we haven’t read these books. (Such a red flag! Damn! We never wanted to be this person!) But the phrases seem like unlikely ones to rip. Also, if you gave us these scenes, we would write them the same way, and, as an editor at a teen girls’ mag, we do see so much of the same phrasing all the time in the fiction submissions and in the books that come in over the transom–the equivalent of rhyming “rain” and “pain” in a rock song.

Our point: Has anyone read the 2,000 OTHER teen novels published that year? Any critic of the author should read at least 20, then get back to us.

9. “Skurnick continued, “The impulse at a place like the 17th Street is to have a house voice. There are just reams and reams of stuff that’s written… It’s unavoidable that certain phrases will be recycled or said in a certain way… Often what you’ll find is that, it’s not that anyone is copying, it’s just that [these phrases] are the first things a mediocre writer would reach for.”” Mediocre was harsh. In any case, we include ourselves. Let’s massage that to ‘any writer writing for the genre‘, which is more what we meant. And yes, though we don’t have Naomi’s issues with the genre, no one is writing any teenage lesbos like they used to.

10. “It sounds like the market is geared to a certain type of book, and [17th Street] just worked on that with her, and some stuff slipped though — God knows why… But I have to say, [as a] teen editor, you just see the same shit over and over again.” ….Mmmkay, yeah. Well, you do.

In any case, we’re sorry 17th Street is catching any shit for this. Packaging does not, apparent conventional wisdom aside, involve taking a budding author and having her sit down in a room and copy 40 awesome scenes from bestsellers of yore. Nor is it a mind-warp scheme that yields $500,000 checks from those poor dupes at Little, Brown and other major houses on a monthly basis. It’s all anyone there can do to stay drunk until 3. Seriously.

UPDATE: Apparently, boys work at 17th Street. When we were there, there was only one, and he was named “Leslie”. Way to scoop it, Slate.

DOUBLE UPDATE: We forgot. Our own reminiscences.

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ Wednesday, April 26, 2006 1:04 pm | | Comments (1)

I failed you

NO, not because I’ve been posting my bedtime reading suggestions well after bedtime, but because I didn’t post about this saving-the-world essay contest (scroll down, and thanks, Daily Show, for the tip) before the deadline. Sorry. Next time, OK? In the meantime, you were looking for a new market for your work, right? Well, get cracking.

Posted by liam callanan in General @ 9:50 am | | Comments (0)

Turnoff week : 2

A turnoff: the plagiarizing Harvard novelist (LOVE that she’s called the “Harvard novelist”); a revelation: TOH herself and I disagree on this point; she’s sympathetic to the hapless author, or at least more so than I. We’ll monitor this divide shortly and let you know just how soon it will be that your otherwise genial guestblogger gets kicked to the curb.

(Late Tuesday update: Foodfight! And here I was wondering why the plagiaree was taking this all so mildly. (Full disclosure: I’m a Random House author myself, though from a completely different part of their world. (Do you get fussy like this on blogs, btw? “Full disclosure”? I mean, if so, then: full disclosure: I went to Yale, the arch-enemy of plagiarizing Harvard sophomore novelists everywhere. And so did TOH. Go to Yale, I mean. And neither of us has ever been given a $500,000 advance for anything. So we have axes to grind.)))

But no, this is TV Turnoff Week, so we’re sticking to our knitting and continuing to cough up a children’s book a night for you to oppress your children with.

(And you say: you’re late, my kids are already in bed!)

(To which I say: wake ‘em up! It’s never too late for literature.)

Today’s book is Music for Alice, by the breathtaking Allen Say. Say’s books are beautiful, beautiful, and–if the word isn’t disturbing, then maybe unsettling will do. They’re unsettling largely because they look like children’s books, picture books, but Say’s books always take on complex, even ugly topics, and examine them unflinchingly.

For the most part, Music for Alice is a gentle read, though it, too, has its surprises — not least that it’s based on a true story. HM’s site says it’s grade 5-8, but that didn’t keep my 6-year-old from grabbing it off the shelf at the library. As for me, I’m just relieved/thrilled for once to read a picture book where the last page involves the central character dancing, instead of going to sleep (however emulatively helpful a plot device that may be).

(You were disappointed with the ax-grinding link, weren’t you? Ok, fine.)

Posted by liam callanan in General @ Tuesday, April 25, 2006 9:34 pm | | Comments (0)

Turnoff Week

Wherein we list one turnoff per day? Hmm. Interesting idea. But we’ll leave that for the lesser blogs.

Here at The Old Hag, we are still stoking the fires, tending the sheep, killing the calves and darning socks and whatever else you’re supposed to do while the master is out. YES, SHE’S STILL GONE. And: YES, SHE’S LEFT CARE OF THIS BEAUTIFUL BLOG in my insufficient hands. But, here’s a new innovation for week 20 of our mutual exile: I will stop apologizing for my guest-bloggery and just get on with it.

Fly High, Fly Low: It’s TV turnoff week, folks, and that means we’re doing a children’s book a day. (And look, you kidfree hipsters, if that’s too low-brow or no-brow for you, then go ahead and submit a 1500-word story to L Magazine’s fiction contest/barfest, and then let us know how it goes. The event is Thursday night, in Manhattan, and all us married writer-’rents know the dirty little secret of you young and singlers: if you’d not read this post, you’d have absolutely nothing to do Thursday night.)

Where were we? Ah. Tonight, in honor of TV turnoff week, read Don Freeman’s Fly High, Fly Low with your kids. You know Freeman because you’ve read Corduroy to your kids, and you had it read to you back in the day. But if you’ve not read FHFL, you’re in for a treat. I found it at City Lights in San Francisco, which makes sense, because it’s a paean to San Francisco — a decades-old San Francisco, anyway — and parenthood.

Sweet dreams.

PS It’s worth tracking down Freeman’s autobiography — Come One, Come All — an orphan, he came to New York to be a musician, lost his trumpet on a subway, got his start in children’s books from…William Saroyan?

Posted by liam callanan in General @ Monday, April 24, 2006 8:52 pm | | Comments (0)

What kind of car do you drive anyway?

Is the best question I’ve ever received after a reading. It was at Washington, DC’s Ballou High School, whose students also asked me to autograph my books on the jacket flap, over my picture. One of my favorite readings ever.

And another favorite reading — and another reason why this FoTOH has been silent for going on 48 hours — was in Richmond, Virginia Wednesday night. I Know — i should have posted word here so all you TOHagians could have gotten in your cars and driven to see me, but I am too HUMBLE. In any case, the New Virginia Review’s incomparable Mary Flinn invited me to town to cap off their Poetic Principles series, which consists of Pulitzer Prize winning poets and…me.

I read at the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts’ Pauley Center — better known as –yes, there was such a thing — the former Confederate Widows Home — which still housed such as recently as a decade ago.

Q. Did Alan Gurganus ever do a reading of The Oldest Living Confederate Widow Tells All here?

A. Why aren’t you asking questions about me? About my car?

More about Richmond, Washington, DC — where FoTOHOTR — Friend of Old Hag on the Road — is now — and points inbetween to follow soon enough.

In the meantime, thanks to Avis, I am driving a sky-blue Buick LeSabre, the choice of poets and grandparents everywhere.

Posted by liam callanan in General @ Friday, April 21, 2006 8:58 am | | Comments (0)

Brooklyn Sestina (today’s writing prompt)

Don’t get your hopes up with this post’s suggestively poetic title. TOH is ill–not gravely, folks, just laid low, don’t send flowers, just buy her book and cheer her up!–and so I shall continue my daily task of making you miss her all the more.

“Brooklyn Sestina” is the title of of a short story in Alice Mattison’s latest, lovely intersecting story collection, In Case We’re Separated. I’ve been a fan of hers ever since “We Two Grown-ups” (whose first paragraph I’ve been using for a decade as a writing prompt with students) appeared in The New Yorker (it was later collected in Men Giving Money, Women Yelling).

But what’s cool–and maybe I’m just being a totally nerdy English major here–is the author’s note at the end:

“This book’s thirteen stories imitate in prose the thirteen stanzas of a double sestina, using repeated topics or tropes in something like the way a sestina…uses repeated words. In the changing order prescribed by the sestina pattern, each story includes a glass of water, a sharp point, a cord, a mouth, an exchange, and a map that may be wrong.”

So that’s your writing assignment today. Write a book. In sestina format. Or give us 7 items and I’ll have Lizzie write it. Or read the Best American-winning title story of the collection. Or read this fave Elizabeth Bishop sestina. Or nominate other collections of “intersecting stories” for the TOH bookshelf.

(Where’s the usual wacky Milwaukee/midwest navel-gazing you’ve come to expect from your pinch-hitter? Look, it’s Severe Weather Awareness Week here, so we’re kind of busy, AND I was sequestered in a monastery all weekend, so — well, I guess there’s your wacky Milwaukee dose right there. More to follow.)

Posted by liam callanan in General @ Monday, April 17, 2006 2:03 pm | | Comments (0)

Shock-jocking the Grundy County dead [in toto]

Like I said, fair’s fair, and the challenge put out was to ignore the SF Chronicle Magazine’s admonition — “Topics we’re not so interested in include bouts with illness, death of a parent or loved one (unless you’re Dave Eggers), childhood memories of Playland-at-the-Beach, children’s charming antics, special pet stories and childhood sports memories” — and instead, write a piece that included bouts with illness, the death of a parent, childhood memories of Playland-at-the-Beach, charming antics, childhood sports memories and Dave Eggers. Because I believe in setting the bar very low, I thought I’d go first and give my essay a lousy title (see post headline).

(Note to coffee breakers: this ain’t a quick one.)

(Note to TOH true fans: again, I’m just the guest-blogger, Ms. Liz will be back before you know it, just as soon as she extracts herself from yet another messy situation, of the sort that constantly plagues world class lit-bloggers.)

*

My wife’s grandmother lived on the same street as Des Moines’ leading afternoon drivetime DJ, who came on just after Rush Limbaugh and shared with Grandmother Wood a love of all things Republican, and tomatoes.

We had that much in common, then. I loved garden-grown tomatoes, too. My wife, the granddaughter, not so much. When she was a toddler, she’d turned up her nose at some tomatoes – she turned up her nose at most food during childhood, apparently – and Grandmother Wood, in this case and all others, a force to be reckoned with, force-fed her a good-sized portion of some raw, red, fleshy, height-of-summer tomatoes. To this day, my wife will not eat tomatoes unless someone else has bravely gone ahead and smashed and cooked them beyond recognition.

The thing is, Grandmother Wood was right about those tomatoes. I mean, if you’ve ever tasted a tomato straight from the garden, mid-July, you know how extraordinary they are. I’m not sure I’d go the force-feeding route; I’d sooner eat them all myself. But I can see why someone would be so incredulous that her own genes weren’t correctly manifesting themselves in a young child’s palate.

And Grandmother Wood was right about everything else, too. She left Iowa to get a degree from Wellesley in the 1920s, returning with a degree and education that took her around the state, around the world. A woman with knowledge could do anything, and this is something she exemplified, and inculcated in her granddaughters. One of the ways she put her education to use was by including reading and “correcting” the manuscript of my first novel.

Because I was a thoroughgoing Catholic, because I was Irish (a drunkard), because I spent much of my childhood at Playland-at-the-Beach, or its successor, the entire State of California, because I knew as much about baseball—one of her passions—as I did the surface of Pluto, and especially because I’d proposed to her oldest son’s oldest daughter without asking the oldest son for permission first, I had a lot to overcome to win her approval.

[C’mon, click that “more…” — there’s a weird cemetery scene and everything still to come!]

(more…)

Posted by liam callanan in General @ Thursday, April 13, 2006 1:42 pm | | Comments (0)

Shock jocking the Grundy County dead

1. Yes, I posted yesterday (Wednesday). I take this guest-blogging thing very seriously.
2. No, I won’t be posting this weekend. At the recommendation of fellow, finer dairyland author Dean Bakopoulos, I’m retreating to a monastery to finish-finish the next novel, All Saints. (What, I was supposed to go to Vegas?)
2a. Yes, Lizzie does have a weird predilection for us way-too-Catholic guest-bloggers.
2b. Yes, the monastery has a website.
2c. No, I’m not linking to it. Go stalk Garrison Keillor instead!
3. What’s with this post’s headline? I’ve got my own entry to the “nobody but Dave Eggers” essay contest, and it’s designed to tide you over until I, or, one hopes, the artful Old Hag herself, returns. I’ll post it in a bit.

Say hi to the Easter Bunny this weekend for me, all you animists!

* * *

Posted by liam callanan in General @ 10:11 am | | Comments (1)

Write every day!

Blogs, anyway, at least when you’re pinch-hitting like me.

A long day in the classroom, so only time to link to birthday greetings to Tom, Scott & Bev, all of whom are feted today (Weds.) at Garrison Keillor’s Writers Almanac, but only Scott gets the good quote :

It’s the birthday of Scott Turow, born in Chicago (1949). He wanted to be a writer from an early age and got into a writing program at Stanford. But he was newly married and living on food stamps, and he said, “It finally dawned on me that I was not James Joyce.”

Dislike Mr. Keillor for whatever private reasons you may like (I cannot, because I know his secret: sure, he broadcasts from Minnesota, but he lives here in America’s promised land, Wisconsin [Don’t believe me? It’s not like he’s unlisted, folks. And no, I didn’t call.]) — but you must admire him for that “a writing program at Stanford” business. To paraphrase WC Williams: so much depends on an indefinite article. Anyway, the place has been headed straight downhill since James Joyce graduated.

(Note to stalwarts: I know, linking to Garrison Keillor is not exactly going to polish TOH’s iconoclastic reputation. But I’ll be back tomorrow. In the meantime, get back to Googlefighting. (But before you click, guess who wins: Garrison Keillor vs. Scott Turow?)

Posted by liam callanan in General @ Wednesday, April 12, 2006 10:40 pm | | Comments (1)

Next page