Last-Last-Chance to WIN-WIN-WIN! [Reverb]

dogdays Someone once told us that Leos like nothing more than to give away what they love, and it turns out that this is true. (God forbid we ever procreate.) That’s why we’re offering those who feel they’ve made a poor showing in our Great Gift Giveaway challenge — which remains open until the commencement of 2006, remembs — once last chance to WIN WIN WIN.

We believe that even those of you who spent the days leading up to the election of 2004 with a goosedown pillow clapped firmly around your ears will recall Washingtonienne, the benevolent clerk who parlayed an interlude of ass-fucking into a book deal, a Playboy shoot (we’re so not linking), and even an appearance on T-Muffle (too drunk to find it). That book sucked. Wonkette’s scandal-based book, on the other hand, is a saucy play on media whores, Crackberries and omnipresent, free-drink-seeking bloggers worthy of the swamp from which it rose. You have a chance to get it before the pub date — actually, we just strolled into a B&N and bought it, but whatever — A CHANCE TO GET IT BEFORE THE PUB DATE. Seize the Berry.

The Theme: Working 9 to Fuck You

Dog Days tells the tale of a campaign staffer who, in order to distract the media from a scandal involving her, creates an imaginary tertiary scandal that threatens her life and livelihood. (Well, not really her LIFE, but whatever.) We’re assuming you’ve never had to create a scandal to save your job, but we’re sure you’ve done plenty at work that, if uncovered, could get you fired. We had a boss who, in his psychotic way, used to mutter “fuckyoufuckyoufuckyou” under his breath every time his boss walked by. We ourselves, in our passive-aggressive way, used to type everything stupid our boss ever said to us or to someone on the phone straight into an email as if we were taking dutiful notes, then promptly send the email to all of our friends. So here’s the question: What is/was the most fireable offense you’ve ever committed at work? N.B.: This can be a one-time deal, like deleting the email of a client who’s been rude to you from your boss’s account, or a recurring kind of deal, like taking three roles of toilet paper home every Friday. Only one rule: If it involves bodily excretions of any kind, save it for your own tell-all.

(N.B. squared: We, uh, understand the need for secrecy in this kind of a challenge. Rest assured: You are absolutely safe entering under your real name in the comments because no one reads this blog. Still, if you’re dishing about your present job, we advise an alias. When/if you enter your email, no one sees it but us, but you can also email us directly with your answers if you’re a super-scaredy cat. AND REMEMBER: NO BODILY FLUIDS.)

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ Saturday, December 31, 2005 12:07 pm | | Comments (3)

Anything that puts us in the company of Julie Christie is fine

We need the reverse dictionary lookup feature more every day. [via Maud]

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ 10:51 am | | Comments (1)

We’ve tried to leave him, but…

…the Garamond lingers on. [via L’Ed]

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ 10:32 am | | Comments (0)

Gay Cowboys Are My Weakness

Upon seeing “Brokeback Mountain.”

Old Hag: That movie’s totally going to sweep the Oscars.
Sister of Old Hag: Do you think?
OH: Were there any other good movies this year?
SOOH: I don’t think so.
OH: We have to find them. We have to rent them if there were any.
SOOH: I don’t want to see any movies that aren’t about gay cowboys.

Posted by altehaggen in Uncategorized @ Tuesday, December 27, 2005 1:19 am | Tags: | Comments (5)

Merry Festivus!

We had him at the name of the site: “Xtreme Valkyries.”

If you’re here from my latest review at the NYT, welcome. If you’re here because you will kill your cousin if she insists on continuing to argue why it is all right for companies to fire employees who “choose” to smoke, double welcome. Either way, please feel free to scroll down and try to win one of the many lovely books up for….winning…, or head back further and check out the past year of Old Hag. We’d like to thank the many guest bloggers who took their precious time to donate their wit and wisdom to this space, as well as the BOOG, without whom this site would never validate. And of course, we’d like to thank YOU, readers. Sorry Neil Gaiman was not what you wanted this year. We will kick up some Zadie Smith next time.

Remember, here are the contest rules. They end right at the cusp of next year, baby. Isn’t it awesome how this time of year you can say “next year” and it can mean in, like, five minutes? Anyway — happy holidays. And see you next year.

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ Sunday, December 25, 2005 9:08 am | | Comments (2)

The Old Hag’s Deuxieme Drummers Drumming

Today’s Reading: The Yule Blog (Don’t know WTF this is about? Click here.)

checkin
We know, we know. A pairing of our book* — a shallow pamphlet dashed off with the aid of several handlers in a week with a pure eye on profit — with Paris Hilton’s tour de force — a stroke, a stroke we say, of genius — is not obvious. But if you think about it, you will be BOWLED OVER by the similarities. First of all, you will never read either. Next up. parisOur book: Hotel theme. Paris’s book: Sex tape filmed in a hotel. Our book: Confessional poetry. Paris’s book: You may “Confess it All” to her. Our book: Sexy poems. Paris’s book: Written by ho. (Actually, what are we saying. Whatever poor editorial assistant had to write this thing probably doesn’t even have time to date.) Our book: Earned $700. Paris’s book: May not even crack two figures. Anyway, the main point is we want to get rid of the Paris book and we can’t bring ourselves to foist it upon any decent charity.

Theme: 13 Bloggers Blogging
We think we’ve learned quite a bit about the twelve days of Christmas during this period. First of all, whoever wrote that song was freaking obsessed with birds. We mean, geese, swans, doves, hens partridges…THANK GOD THIS GUY NEVER HEARD OF CHICK FIL A, that’s all we have to say. We’ve also learned that you really hate Neil Gaiman. We mean, YOU FREAKING HATE HIM. And Elizabeth Kostova.

Anyway, we’d like to think of some brilliant confessional question to wrap up this deluge of semi-confessions, but we find we really have just one question. Okay, three. A) What did you want for Christmas? B) What did you get for Christmas? C) If you could have gotten 13 of something, what would it have been?

We can answer you easily. A) One big gift certificate to IKEA and/or Crate and Barrel. B) We don’t know yet; this is a future post. (P.S. WE TOTALLY PSYCHED YOU OUT BECAUSE WE’RE HALF CATHOLIC AND WE DOOOOOO CELEBRATE CHRISTMAS.) C) 13 unpackers unpacking, people, one of whom is, like, a MASTER book alphabetizer. Plus one to haul all the bookcases and shit from IKEA. We’re moving January 5, God help us.

* SECRET POEM ALERT! The winner will also receive a poem that was left out of the book because we forgot to put it in the ms, but that was praised by two lovely people who enjoyed it above all others, even while sitting on a damn concrete floor. We don’t have a SECRET PARIS SEX TAPE! Sorry.

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ 9:00 am | | Comments (5)

Pipe, You Damn Eleven Pipers! PIIIIIIIIIIIIIIPE!

Today’s Reading: Two Words: Hodg. Man. (Don’t know WTF this is about? Click here.)

hodgie We hope it’s not necessary to speak long of the Hodgman. You should by now be aware of his exploits on stage, radio, the “World Wide Interweb“, Flickr, The Daily Show, and that most excellent venue, Mediabistro*. We had the very excellent opportunity to read with him and Messrs. Jonathan Coulton and David Rees recently**, and we were thrilled and delighted with how the former Borges scholar had morphed into a Host of Ceremonies the likes of our brother-in-brother-in-brother-in-law, Jim Gaffigan, which you would only know if you had been to our brother’s wedding, but just try to imagine.

We are pleased and fluttery to announce that we have THREE COUNTEM THREE copies of The Areas of My Expertise to release upon the general reading public, courtesy of John and his publicist Hector DeJean, the latter of whom we mention not least to note that that is inarguably the best. name. EVER.

Theme: Superquestion
Inspired by John’s “Invisible Man or Hawkman” piece, for this challenge, we were simply going to ask whether you would prefer the power of flight or the power to be invisible and why. (We’re so all about the flight. The only thing being invisible would let you do, it seems to us, is view people naked and hear what they said about you when you weren’t around. If you ever want to force a confession from us and have only 34 seconds, try those.) You can simply answer that question — always a winner — or expand it into what superpower you would like in general. Here’s ours.

There’s a gentleman — or a gentlewoman, we have no idea — who has, over the past two days, been attempting, partly successfully, to hack our site. (Apparently, like our parents when were twelve, we had something wrong with our “permissions”.) While we are glad that s/he was content at first simply to erase our post pages — merci! — and then fuck with our blogads — fucker! — if we had our druthers, we would do something even more devastating than learning something about hosting and Content Management Systems and how to actually handle our site without the assistance of someone with a Master’s in Physics and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering. (Thanks, BOOG!)

We would haunt.

Oh, yes. Try messing around with our templates when your door keeps inexplicably slamming and a chill winter wind does blow. Try scanning our site when a death mask appears in that little mirror you have mounted to see when your mom is sneaking up behind you. TRY PUTTING AN EXTRA $ IN OUR BLOGADS WHEN YOUR MONITOR RELEASES A RIVER OF BLOOD AND AMBER TAMBLYN CLIMBS OUT IN A GOALIE /SCREAM MASK AND STABS ALL OF YOUR FRIENDS BECAUSE OF WHO YOU HACKED LAST SUMMER, MISTER. SERIOUSLY, TRY IT. BECAUSE WE DO NOT BELIEVE YOU WILL BE SUCCESSFUL.

Anyway, what’s yours?

* John is also an excellent journalist. If you have access to Nexis-Lexis, or even the World Wide Interweb, you should seek out his work.
** Ubiquitous flickr gallery of John at reading with actual hobo fan incoming.

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ Saturday, December 24, 2005 1:25 pm | | Comments (10)

We Wish it Were Okay to Say “Gay” Again, Because Omigod, Ten Lords A Leaping

Today’s Reading: Love, Actually (Don’t know WTF this is about? Click here.)

meek James Meek’s third novel, set in Siberia during the Russian revolution, comes supported by even more dazzling advance praise on the book jacket than has become the norm; in his case, though, quite a lot of it is deserved.

maps Aslam reveals — artfully and heartbreakingly — a psychology at war with itself. For all the alienation of their exile, his characters’ most devastating and irredeemable loneliness is within.

Theme: No Title
No offense to the very fine authors above, but they have made one terrible mistake in their novels — to wit, using the word “Love” in the title. “Love” may be the most tired title word of all time, though it is being nipped at the heels ravenously by “River,” “Stones,” “Night,” “Lost” (That’s two, Nadeem!) “Maps” (Three!) and “Dying”. Think Run, River, people. Oops. Rabbit, Run, we mean! Shit. Do we have to add “Run” over here, too? * **

So — what’s your LEAST FAVORITE totally FLAGRANTLY FOUL title word? If you want to just throw in the worst entire title of all time, that’s fine too. We’ll start you off with “Plainsong.” ENOUGH WITH THE PLAINSONG.

* Our FAVORITE overused word? “Darling”, as in I Am Thinking of My Darling, My Darling, My Hamburger, and The Darling and Peter Pan’s The Darlings (we’re counting it). We don’t care what you say — you can’t go wrong with “Darling.”
** Bonus buzzer points for the reviewer calling a book “generous.” Unless there’s a fifty stuck between the pages.

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ Friday, December 23, 2005 9:00 am | | Comments (7)

The Old Hag’s 9 Ladies Dancing, And Now He’s Kind of a Perv

Today’s Reading: The Blog to Hell… (Don’t know WTF this is about? Click here. )

Rothbart
Everyone is very fond of Davy Rothbart’s Found, the magazine of the crap that you used to let blow down the street that is apparently a peephole into the inner lives of its former owners. (That is why we shred EVERYTHING — even our soup.) You can read him discussing his lovely new book of short stories here.

underdog
What would happen if you just woke up and decided to do everything you knew you sucked at? Well, we call it Monday. Joshua Davis had to push the sucking envelope a little further — to be exact, until he was facing one three-hundred pound scantily clad Japanese man. We’ll stick with trying to beat our best friend’s brisket.

Theme: …is Paved With Broken Links
Well, now we understand why our parents used to just hand us an old pot and a stick to bang it with around the holidays — this gift-giving shit is HARD. (Oh, you think these web-optimized photos and Amazon links just magically appear, do you?) We have to tell you, at this point, we’d be happy to just let those other 8 fucking ladies dance while we go off and smoke pot with the help. But we’re going to POWER THROUGH THIS SHIT, MOTHERFUCKERS. And it occurs to us: That’s the theme of our books today, too. It’s not easy to continually wade through a lot of crap, photocopy it, send it to a bunch of people who find it terribly touching however much they’d like to dismiss it as some This American Life emo shit. It’s certainly not easy to keep getting your ass whupped by what is, for all intents and purposes, a series of scantily clad Japanese men. So what is it that keeps you going with projects when all the joy has been leached out of the process by the sheer length of the haul? We have to tell you, for us it’s money and/or Technorati links. We assume the rest of you can at least recommend a good Scotch.

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ Thursday, December 22, 2005 3:52 pm | | Comments (4)

The Old Hag’s Lactose-Love Eight Maid’s a Milking—Ho!!!

Today’s Reading: Twin it to Win It (Don’t know WTF this is about? Click here.)

McCarthy When your Old Hag was a wee, disgruntled lass, we wrote a dutifully disgruntled review of Tara McCarthy’s first book, mainly because we couldn’t understand WHY ANYONE WOULD WRITE A BOOK WHEN THEY COULD BE HAVING SEX. She was v. v. good-natured about my and others’ ribbing—heh—and we are very pleased to offer her book much-lauded book to fulfill the beloved Siamese ritual we understand is an age-old part of the Christmas holiday.

twins We have known Marcy since birth, so you can’t REALLY trust us when we say her book is tragically good. WE DO NOT BELIEVE THE NEW YORK TIMES, NEWSDAY, AND THE VILLAGE VOICE have known her since birth, however. We mean, they might have gone to camp together or something, but we don’t think they were even in the same bunk.*

Theme: Twin Fantasies
Some of you have misunderstood this immediately. Shame on you. But today’s contest involves raking your subconscious to produce the person of your secret twin. We don’t care who you are: Unless you have an ACTUAL twin, you have a fantasy twin, just like you have fantasy adoptive parents and possibly a fantasy dog, although if so you might just want to head out to the SPCA and get that dog because it’s not really that hard. Anyway, our fantasy twin is not the nicest. She’s slightly taller, thinner and better-looking, and she’s always talking on the phone to her boyfriend, slightly depressed, and not telling me what’s going on. We would borrow her clothes, but we can’t quite carry them off. She doesn’t look great in ours either. Make of that what you will.

So, who’s your twin? Bonus points for psychoanalyzing yourself to boot. What the hell, psychoanalyze us while you’re at it. Jeez, WHAT COULD OUR TWIN POSSIBLY MEAN? SO HARD TO PICK OUT THE NEUROSIS!!!!! **

* We actually have TWO COUNTEM TWO “TWINS” TO GIVE AWAY! WE ARE SEPARATING THEM AT BIRTH!
** Do you have an ACTUAL twin? You can’t enter this contest. Sorry. Try to cough up some adoptive parents or wait for tomorrow.

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ Wednesday, December 21, 2005 4:45 pm | | Comments (4)

Next page