And speaking of which, can you believe it’s DECEMBER ALREADY FOR CHRISSAKES NO PUN INTENDED?
Posted by Lizzie on 11/30/05
Boldtype‘s year-end issue should cover all your book-buying holiday needs.
Filed under: Lit-ish | Comments (0)
Posted by Lizzie on 11/30/05
Boldtype‘s year-end issue should cover all your book-buying holiday needs.
Filed under: Lit-ish | Comments (0)
Posted by Lizzie on 11/29/05
We know we haven’t been blogging a lot lately. We would like to say it’s because we’ve been so busy on our cross-country book tour, but that would be a lie. To impart it with a grain of truth, however, we would like to let all of you know that we will be reading with the hobo-centric John Hodgman this Thursday, Dec. 1 at 7 p.m. at the University of Baltimore, which is conveniently located near the train station, if you were to take a train in Baltimore, which we highly recommend, since we’re not going to read for that long, but John will.
Ooo! Here are more details. UBalt calls John a Parodist, we call him the First Man to Publish Us, Thus Allowing Us to Expose the Entire Yale Population to A Thinly Veiled Account of Our Breakup with Our First Boyfriend. Whatever works for you.
Filed under: Lit-ish | Comments (0)
Posted by Liam on 11/28/05
Traveling. Traveling with children is like the Parenting Olympics, and if you’ve not done it recently with young children, let me tell you what it’s all about: telling them they don’t have to take off their shoes at the security checkpoint, then letting them because they want to, then chasing them, then getting the TSA to draw their guns because you’ve gone around the security cordon. And this is way, way before the mini-DVD player runs out of batteries halfway through Dora the Explorer or one of your mini-children tries to flush your wallet down the airplane potty.
But then, every so often, magic occurs and then fall asleep for an entire flight. And you read.
What I read, what you should read: James Houston’s Snow Mountain Passage. True, I’m making my class read it — a mark against any text — but it’s wondrous, and I’m not just saying that because he, like me, seems obsessed with the quality of light in California, or because he once visited a class I was in.
I’m saying it because it’s winter, I recently left my mother-in-law’s sunny-and-70 beach for blizzard-pending Milwaukee, and i STILL could not put down this book, even though it had the word snow in the title and is, in fact, um, about the Donner Party. (And so, so much more folks!) Buy it now. Besides, it’s in first person, big gobs of it, so you know everyone doesn’t die at the end.
Filed under: General | Comments (0)
Posted by Liam on 11/26/05
I actually wasn’t quite sure why she’d ask me to guest-blog; now I know.
(If you want gossip and snark about the Times‘ 2005 Notable Books list, just out, look elsewhere. While I like the new, shorter version, I grumpily side with previous guest-blogger Tayari — if you really wanted to highlight the best books of the year, why stretch (or limit) your list to a nice round number like 100?) That said, any list that includes Alice Mattison is fine by me.
Filed under: General | Comments (1)
Posted by Liam on 11/24/05
So our latest gambit is that Lizzie comes up with the headline, and then I do the post. This one is a toughie, I’ll admit. But we’ll handle it, because I’m a runner, and runners can do anything.
Each year on Thanksgiving, I go for a run on the beach, following the hardpack sand at the water’s edge all the way down to the amphib assault base, where I tag the rusted barbed-wire fence and then turn and head for home.
No, I’m not going to do anything with that, other than offer up a prize of a warmly autographed copy of The Cloud Atlas to the first person who submits proof of having published a short story using that sentence as its first line.
Instead I’m going to do a quick bit on Twain and Thanksgiving and then make fun of you for sitting at the computer.
A friend of mine once asked for something to say, something secular but spiritual, at the Thanksgiving table. (People ask me this all the time, not because I’m a great novelist or runner, but because I once was a great, great corporate speechwriter.) So I came up with this, from Twain:
“To us our house was not unsentient matter–it had a heart & a soul & eyes to see us with, & approvals & solicitudes & deep sympathies; it was of us, & we were in its confidence, & lived in its grace & in the peace of its benediction. We never came home from an absence that its face did not light up & speak out its eloquent welcome–& we could not enter it unmoved.”
Which is lovely; all kinds of home and family riffs you can do after reading that.
What I neglected to tell my friend was the context of the quote, it was from a letter Twain wrote to a friend, wherein he imagined his dying daughter’s final hours, which she spent in that house, without her father at her side. Twain had all but fled to Europe, having fallen in dire financial straits. At least, Twain wrote, his daughter’s last vision was of the house they had all loved.
So, Mark Twain, loser (I always bring it back around, folks): lost his house, his fortune, his daughter. Now I have far too much in common with Twain–save the posthumous fame thing–so I can say with great authority: drop the mouse, put away the keyboard, go back into the living room. You told them all you were ducking out to write, because you Write Every Day, but then, soon enough, and you didn’t mean to, but here you are, surfing blogs. You need to write every day but today, because today you need to go back out there, find crazy Uncle Rob, who lost his house, wife, daughter, dog, and whom no one has talked to in five years and who invited him anyway–you go up to him, bring him a drink, touch his arm, tell him a story and tell him to tell one to you.
Happy Thanksgiving, readers–and when you snap that wishbone today, hope for Lizzie’s speedy return…
Filed under: General | Comments (3)
Posted by Liam on 11/22/05
My then-two-year-old (I hate isn’t-my-toddler-cute stories, too, but hang in there), the first time we installed her in one of those bike seats above the rear tire of daddy’s bike, was terrified. And she’s not very terrifiable. It took a block or so of her desperately hanging on before the concept took hold, and as we picked up speed and the wind finally started weaving through her helmeted hair, she suddenly shouted, “Sing with me, boys!” And we were off.
So think of the blog as a bike and me as a two-year-old and hectoring emails from the Old Hag’s proprietriess (“why haven’t you guest blogged anything recently, jerk? I’m paying you, aren’t I?” [She's not.])–well think of her emails to me as the wind in my hair, and here I am, off and singing, naturally enough, about metaphor.
Let’s stop at the crosswalk first, though, and clarify my whole guesting thing. It’s not so much that Lizzie is out/away/staying in North Dakota Holiday Inns, as she was the last time we caretook this blog. She’s still around, but we’ve divvied up the world. She will cover: real estate, acts profane, words profane, funny SPAM, and herself. I will cover: metaphor, acts literary, acts of the apostles, things Milwaukee, and herself, although in this case, herself will refer to one of my two smaller daughters.
Lizzie has also asked me to tee-up the world’s richest metaphor prize, amount TBD, and offer a few nominations. Happy to.
> Best metaphor/simile from a Canadian poet: “Rather, I should say the book started in my front hall on October 24, 2000 when I lay on my belly thrashing like a beached Cut-throat trout, my mouth full of blood and the crystal threads of vodka…” from Patrick Lane in Bookninja. What I like about this is that, yes, of course, you usually can’t swing a fish without hitting a bad metaphor, but what makes this work is the blood, and then those “crystal threads.” Tingly perfect.
> Best unlinkable, unforgettable image: from a 1990 restaurant review I read, never forgot, and recently discovered I’d liked so much that I’d packed in the bottom of a box which has made five moves with us. It appeared in the ill-fated, pre-Time Out New York, and altogether great publication, Seven Days. The author–whose name I’ll go hunting through my basement for–described the restaurant as being “suffused with an orange/pink glow, the kind of light you associate with loosely-planned vacations.” Yum.
> Best reference to Miss Aluminum, which isn’t quite a metaphor, or maybe it is: “…I remember that Moore shook her silver bracelets a few times, and that she answered one question from the audience by informing us that she was speaking as a former Miss Aluminum…” from Richard McCann, over at The Happy Booker, where a happy few are engaged in the desperate endeavor of saving one of DC’s loveliest independent bookstores, Chapters. (For additional procrastinating fun, try googling up the source of Miss Aluminum, and find out how many people out there just plain miss aluminum–bats, roofs, and more. So much sadness, so little foil.)
> Best completely unfair, but devastating, and perfect, and bingo, I’ve gotten us back around to this post’s headline metaphor/simile: “Which may be why Rumsfeld’s military, as of late September, had assigned just 1,000 Marines to cover the western half of the 376-mile border with Syria. Picture five major college marching bands stretched over the distance between Washington and Trenton, N.J.” from David Von Drehle in the Washington Post. What’s great here is not just that tweaky little word “major”–re-read it, that’s key–but the DC to Trenton bit. If you’ve ever ridden the train from DC past Trenton to NYC, you’ll know why he picked that span.
Now, then: cue apartment-hunting post. Rest of you: back to work.
Filed under: General, Lit-ish | Comments (0)
Posted by Lizzie on 11/20/05
We just have to point out that this is the funniest email we have ever received:
As the webmaster for Zolen Calo’s novels, I found you during a search for
websites that complement the themes of Zolen’s fiction. I saw that your site
was trustworthy, linguistically clever, and regularly visited — according to my
Google review of sites related to personal and social alienation. Because of
the interests you and Zolen apparently share, he asked that I add your site to
his sharing page. This I have done effective today.You can view your connection at www.zolencalonovels.com/pendinglinks.htm under the category of alientation and disconnectedness.
Zolen would hope for you to connect your website to his in return. The address
is [redacted].I know it is sometimes difficult to get around to uploading edits to like-minded
sites, so I intend to maintain your link from Zolen until May 1, 2006 even if
you don’t get back to him.When your link is confirmed, it may be lifted from its current page to the
Argentum Page where it might better build the interest of our readers through
our expression of artistic fraternity. In the meantime, thank you for sharing
with Zolen in the great world of ideas. Bkhrb Wrlnghk, Webmaster
Do you think if we tell our psychiatrist that even Google now recognizes our personal and social alienation, he will give us the good drugs?
Filed under: WTF | Comments (3)
Posted by Lizzie on 11/18/05

My blog is worth $0.00.
How much is your blog worth?
Not that we didn’t already know this, but way to rub it in, Tristan. [via Beatrice]*
* Don’t get your panties in a twist — since blogs we abandoned long ago still seem to be worth SOMETHING, we’re assuming that the applet doesn’t recognize “the” or something. (We should have gone with “yea, verily, le” instead.) Still, this should serve as a reminder to some of you to update your bookmarks, if only so we can garner a few scant crumbs of ego while wasting time on the arbiters of blog hottitude. We switched addresses three times in one year, people. Haven’t we lost enough already?
Filed under: WTF | Comments (2)
Posted by Lizzie on
Baltimore poet Elizabeth Skurnick writes like Tom Waits trapped inside the body of a desperate housewife.
We don’t know why this kind gentleman gave us such a lovely review, but we’re prepared to wine and dine him with some Natty Boh and minifranks. (When we sell the next book, we’ll upgrade to Safeway brie and boxed wine.)
Filed under: Lit-ish | Comments (3)
Posted by Lizzie on
Occasionally-wile foet-stalker Alan Cordle has a list of the offenders for your holiday shopping needs.* **
* Liam has told us to stop interrupting him. We totally will, except when we post.
** Because of circumstances beyond our control, we missed the one Daily Show we have ever missed and the only one we need to see: the one containing Hodg-man. Does anyone have it on tape of Tivo or whatever the kids are using nowadays?
Filed under: Lit-ish | Comments (0)
Posted by Lizzie on 11/17/05
We’re sorry we’ve been so lame on the blog lately, but this is mainly because we have been forced to embark on the harrowing search for a new apartment. Well, actually, in Baltimore, it’s not so harrowing. While in other cities apartments fly off the market like so many…things that fly quickly off things, the housing market in Baltimore in mid-November is roiling at approximately the rate of a bowl of pea soup left for two hours on the kitchen table. Which makes the following exchange so bizarro.
—–Original Message—–
From: [Redacted]
To: ESkurnick
Cc: [Redacted]
Sent: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:56:53 -0500
Subject: Apt.Dear Lizzy,
Nice to meet you yesterday. I have had an opportunity to speak with some of the other owners, and we are prepared to have the apartment painted for you on the condition that you sign a two year lease. Although we have not gotten written estimates, we believe it may cost more than $1000 to paint, which is both an investment in the property, and in keeping happy tenants.
The former owner indicated to me that if you turn your heat down during the day while you are at work (it is electric baseboard), you should expect utilities in the neighborhood of $100/month. As I have told you, we just purchased the property last week, so I really don’t know any more than that. The former owner did suggest that new tenants contact BGE and calculate a 12 month history, and get on budget billing. Just a thought.
Thanks in advance for getting back to me at your earliest convenience. I have shown the apt. to a few other interested folks, but you saw it first, so I will give you the opportunity to get back to me before contacting them.
I don’t think you told me if you are interested in moving in Dec. 1? Will need to know to arrange the painters.
Best regards,
[Redacted]
Another thing you should know: This particular apartment was going for $1250. We know: All of you New Yorkers have immediately decided it’s time to move to Baltimore. To be fair, it was a two-bedroom apartment with twenty-foot ceiling, person-sized bay windows, and French doors. BUT IT HAD NOT BEEN PAINTED IN 12 YEARS, IT WAS PLUS HEAT AND HOT WATER, AND THE KITCHEN WAS CIRCA 1940. Usually $1250 in Baltimore, will, as Fran Lebowitz once commented, get you the Winter Palace, fully furnished. Or you know, at least, a whole HOUSE.
So, though we are constitutionally opposed to responding via email how we would ACTUALLY LIKE TO RESPOND, we sent this:
—
Dear [Redacted],
Thanks so much for getting back to me. I’m afraid I’m going to have to say no, though — if you want a two-year lease to paint the apartment, I’m terrified of what you’ll need if the refrigerator breaks.
All best,
Lizzie
We await our karmic retribution.
Filed under: WTF | Comments (10)
Posted by Lizzie on
Before we get into this, we have to explain that we have AOL. We do not have AOL because we still refer to the “World Wide Web” by its full name or get misty at the memory of that screechy connection sound, but merely because we once wrote for the defunct Time Digital and they died before they paid us but our editor gave us a free media account first. ($30/months times 9 years equals…what? Twelve billion dollars?) Anyway, the point is, we logged onto our webmail this morning and saw this.
This server runs software that has not yet been deployed to a broader AOL internal or external community—it is used by members of the product development team to access their own production accounts. “Eating our own dog food” ensures that we live with the software before any one else tries to use it; this is a critical step in our software certification process.
Philosophers can disagree about whether or not one’s dog’s food is actually one’s “own”, but we think there’s a deeper problem. Either someone was trying to do the family-friendly version of “shitting where we eat” and got very confused, or, WE, AOL USERS, ARE THE DOGS.
Filed under: WTF | Comments (1)
Posted by Lizzie on 11/16/05
Just a quickie: In OSX the WordPress has no WYSIWYG editor which is very annoying WP editors get on that BUT: John Hodgman, who should not be confused with Johns Hopkins, is O MY LORD going to be on THE DAILY SHOW TONIGHT!!!!!!!!! THAT IS LIKE SO MUCH BETTER THAN JOHNNY CARSON FOR OUR GENERATION!!!!!!!!!! LIVE IT, LOVE IT, GOOGLE IT, TIVO IT!
Filed under: Lit-ish | Comments (3)
Posted by Lizzie on 11/15/05
You know what? We say “you know” way too much. OMIGOD, you know what else? WE SAY OMIGOD A LOT. It is a wonder the the intimable Ed has managed to make us sound like we’ve graduated high school, to say nothing of literate and funny. Or maybe we just like the sound of our own voice.
Filed under: Lit-ish | Comments (1)
Posted by Liam on
I’d intended to write about our fine and funny and well-attended visiting author reading last week here in Milwaukee, but Slate distracted me as it always does, so I’m going to pick up this thread from them, wherein they ask famous and/or random people what their first “literary crush in college was.” (Go ahead and click the link–I know, it’s risky for a blogger to suggest that, since it’s likely you’ll never return, but I’m banking on the fact that when you reach Mark Cuban singing the praises of (guess, now) The Fountainhead, you’ll come clicking right back.
Other than Ayn Rand (although: why is it, my best students are always, always into Rand or Buffy or both?), the big surprise for me on the list was, no poetry. (Did I read it too fast and miss someone recommending poetry? If so, don’t point it out, because it’s better grist for me if they didn’t.) I’m not bemoaning the lack of poetry that just because poems are a recurring vice of The Old Hag’s proprietor. And I’m not using this as some sort of launching point into the always reassuringly tedious Whither Poetry debate (or, MLA style: W(h)ither Poetry: the Hermeneutics of Vertical Composition).
I’m saying it because I need to send an urgent message to Cuban and the rest of the guys (almost all guys, aren’t they?): if poetry wasn’t your first crush in college, get back to school, losers. I didn’t discover my literary crush (nor my wife) until senior year, and then it was William Carlos Williams–oh, his feet were so cold in bed!–specifically, his book-length Paterson. Which has nothing to do with white chickens, red wheelbarrows or rainwater. Now that I’ve grown up to be a guest-blogger (a week more of this will completely obliterate any rep I had as a novelist), maybe it seems as though I wasted my time falling for poetry, but, you’re wrong. It’s all about poetry. It only ever has been. I’m of the school that every writer starts with too many words: those who whittle away enough, make poems. The rest of us stall in prose.
Filed under: General | Comments (1)
Posted by Liam on 11/14/05
We’ll turn to the more substantive areas of the literary life later this week–like who said what to whom at our latest torrid round of Milwaukee literary parties last week–Carolyn Ferrell was in town, and we had quite a time–but first, to that NYT article that everyone’s been tap-tap-tapping about (love lit blogs: “everyone” = the 20 or so of us who care about print). You know the one: the retired cataloging librarian whose husband gave her the fabulous gift of the complete Penguin Classics line. All 1,000 plus books, 70-odd linear feet, 700 pounds. Good thing shipping is free (although for $8,000, I think they should also stick Jeff Bezos on the delivery pallet and have him unload and read them to you).
When I told my wife I was going to blog about this, she said, good–you’re going to talk about what is and what isn’t a classic?
Um–no? Instead, I set out to find what the most expensive book set (or book) on Amazon is these days. I’m not sure I have yet, but here’s my current candidate, tracked down with the help of Froogle: The Uralic And Altaic Series (Indiana University Publications), which is going for $22,350, even. There are a couple things I really, really like about this book. One is that one of those “used & new” sellers is offering it for $12.76. Another is the first line, “Do you have a stamp and an envelope?” But the best is that the publisher has made it searchable online, which means with the print-screen command and a printer, you could really save yourself a ton of dough. And you’d learn how to say, “don’t go above ten turgiks!” in Uralic (if the link doesn’t work, just go to search inside, and flip to the defintion for above).
Ok, back to work, everybody. (National novel writing month is halfway over, after all.)
Filed under: General | Comments (0)
Posted by Liam on
Good morning and welcome to Monday. We’ll start, once again, with reassurance: The Old Hag is coming back. Soon, or soonish. And anyway, you’re allowed to take a week off every now and then if OPRAH CALLS YOU ABOUT YOUR CHAPBOOK. Or even if she doesn’t, which is the case here. But I’ve got a good feeling about this. I can see Lizzie’s appearance now: after careful pre-show negotiations with her publisher, Oprah has secured copies for the entire audience. It would be a bit like her free-car giveaway, complete with on-set emergency medical help: “YOU get a chapbook!” “And YOU get a chapbook!” “And YOU! And YOU!” As they all rain from the rafters.
Frankly, just to hear someone–anyone–say chapbook on network television would be enough for me to take a week off myself and celebrate.
Filed under: General | Comments (0)
Posted by Liam on 11/09/05
Which is my extremely, extremely clever way of saying that 1) the blog boss is away and 2) today’s topic–since, let’s face it, I don’t have the IQ to discuss much greater–is children’s literature.
(And besides, what’s at my bedside this week–Indecision, The Diviners, On Beauty, Ponzi’s Scheme; some books finished, some not–you’ve already read about elsewhere. I’ll offer my 2 c later this week.)
So, what do writers read to their children? Since I work in academia now, I’ve got to go for full MLA-worthy sourcing, so let me say I got this idea from Colby’s talented Debra Spark, who asked a range of authors this question.
But she didn’t ask me.
1. The Jelly Book, by Ralph Steadman. This is the best picture book, and enough already with your protests. Want proof? Here it is: it’s out of print, like all the very best books. Read it and wonder why Steadman, the prolific and cracked artist, perhaps most famous for his association with Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, ever did anything other than children’s books. It’s about jelly–which is British for “jello” apparently, but we’ve never seen a need to explain this to our American daughters–and is hilarious to adults and kids (and not in that grindingly awful, wink-wink sort of way animated movies seem to favor nowadays). Amazon has some for sale, but they’re expensive and hard to find, largely because we’ve bought up most of the remaining supply. Sorry.
2. George and Martha, by James Marshall. George and Martha, hippos and best friends, only get fatter, it seems, from story to story. And that is FUNNY. Also, the independent-minded Martha makes for a fine female role-model, which I’m all about now, since we’ve got an all-girl family going here. (Like everyone else, we chafe at the world according to Disney, where every girl’s goal is a boy. Also, my wife hates Disney because–Bambi, Nemo, Beauty and the Beast, take your pick–the mother always dies. (Want to know why? Answer revealed tomorrow.)
3. Fly High Fly Low, by Don Freeman. I picked this book up at City Lights in San Francisco, when I was looking for a guilt-gift to take home from a California reading tour. I love it. I love San Francisco, I love Don Freeman, and this is a beautiful book.
Just three? That’s all for now, dear. Take a nap and we’ll be back with more, including some hot-off-the-presses ones. (As a new author myself, I feel like I should support fellow debutants.) Nominations welcome.
Filed under: Lit-ish | Comments (1)
Posted by Lizzie on
The lively and coin-happy Liam Callanan has gallantly offered to step in and get some of you in jail by placing more bets on the Booker. (The Booker is over; we just like the alliteration.) Yes, we know, we uploaded a new version of Word Press and our images are not working. You know what? YOU TOTALLY DIDN’T “SEE” THEM ANYWAY. More later.
Filed under: Lit-ish | Comments (0)
Posted by Lizzie on 11/03/05
The bad news is, we’re going to have to take some time off from the blog. The good news is, we have a lot of readings for Check-In coming up this week where you can communicate with us in person, if you like (you know, not DURING, but after). You can catch us at the following:
November 6
MINÁS Gallery & Boutique
815 West 36th Street
Baltimore, MD 21211
Tel: 410-732-4258
4 p.m. – 6 p.m.November 9
412: Creative Nonfiction Festival
The Quiet Storm
5430 Penn Ave
Pittsburgh, PA 15206-3424
8 p.m. [flyer here]November 11
Faculty reading*
Johns Hopkins University
Homewood Campus
Olin Hall, Room 305
3400 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21218-2685
Reception 6-7, Reading 7-8
We’re going to try to keep up with our sidebar reviews in the meantime, and also continue our work on a secret project designed to bring fame and fortune to you all. More soon.
* We know we’re not listed there, but we’ll be there.
Filed under: Lit-ish | Comments (0)