The City That Actually Does Read

We’re going out of town for the rest of the week, so that’s the last of our piddling information for all three of you. Before we remind you once again to give, though, we would like to draw your attention to two wonderful works, John Rowell’s The Music of Your Life and Liam Callanan’s The Cloud Atlas (not the one you think), the latter of which is up for an Edgar — which pleases though perplexes the author, as it is apparently “not a mystery.” the author. We have no idea why we said it waas not a mystery; THAT, my friends, is the mystery. (B-more BFF Laura Lippman also has her last Tess Monaghan mystery By a Spider’s Thread in the running — the entire series is a must-must-read.) We had the distinct pleasure hearing these gentlemen read last night, then chatting with them about how much Sideways sucked and hookers and suchlike. Arthur Bradford was also there, and though he did not read, he is cuteNOT AS CUTE AS LIAM. Buy his book, too. What the hell, while you’re at it, buy my other friend Laura’s book, and visit her husband’s blog. We can’t think of anyone else to pimp right now, but we think this should be enough to fill King Wenclas with a bilious rage.

Posted by altehaggen in Uncategorized @ Thursday, February 24, 2005 1:00 pm | Tags: | Comments (6)

Yes, yes, $250. Shut up.

We’ve never been able to get too worked up about the incestuousness of the poetry world. In the first place, the rewards are so piddling. (We just received the sum of $250 — yes, that’s $250 — for our upcoming chapbook, and while we are THRILLED about it, we’re going to repeat, $250). In the second place, there’s always a thin line between being helped by a mentor and insidercabalishpractices. Building contacts in any field is central to one’s success, so sayeth the sage.

That said, however, we love and revere Foetry, which is gearing up for a lawsuit against the apparently incestuous Iowa Short Fiction Awards, as well as their poetry counterpart. For the lucky un-poets out there, we’ll explain: almost all book publication in the poetry world occurs through contests, which the poet pays anything from $10 to $30 to enter. This is not because anyone’s raking it in, but because poetry makes no money and the contest proceeds support the publication of the winner. This year, for example, we spent about $400 in entry fees, which doesn’t include mailing or copying costs, which amounted to another $200 or so. For a pursuit that yields less profit than glass-blowing, this is an enormous outlay, and poets take it right in the sonnet (sorry). Hence, it is intensely irritating to repeatedly see graduates of the program in which the press is situated win. WHY DID YOU TAKE MY $20 THAT I COULD HAVE SPENT ON A FUCKING CRATE OF OODLES OF NOODLES, FUCKER? the poet must ask. Foetry’s watchdog lawyer explains more politely:

You may certainly award anything to anyone, as long as you do it out of your own private pocket. But the minute you request money from the public with the understanding that their work will be judged on its merits, free of all previous connections, relationships or contact between the entrant and the judge, you engage yourself to behave in a fair manner. When the result of your contest clearly illustrates that in reality you have a very short list of actual candidates for the prize, all of whom have an illicit connection to your university and with the judges, you are no longer acting in a fair manner.

If Gary and JoJo in the morning don’t let WXPR employees or relatives enter the fucking contest, neither should The University of Iowa. [via Maud]

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ 11:37 am | | Comments (2)

Oh, yes. If you send them, we will post them

There were people in our college with blond-ish dreadlocks who used to spend all day stoned, then write manifestos into the early hours, sometimes doing us the honor of showing them to us the next day. We believe these persons might appreciate the convenience and style of The Franklin Covey Mission Statement Builder, which uses Flash instead of schwag. [via Lifehacker, which we don’t want to love, but we love]

Posted by altehaggen in WTF @ Wednesday, February 23, 2005 4:58 pm | | Comments (4)

* To Boldly Go Where Every Man Wants You To Go

Simon & Schuster is bringing out “Rainbow Party,” by Paul Ruditis*, a young-adult novel about oral sex.

Really? It’s ENTIRELY ABOUT ORAL SEX?

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ 12:40 pm | | Comments (1)

Define “Attack”

Bookslut’s fro-sporting Michael Schaub draws our attention to the unheretofore understood restroom-threat smut in libraries poses to children:

“I’m not going to let it lie,” she said. “Do we want to wait until a child is attacked or molested in a restroom? It’s not a matter of if but a matter of when.”

Clearly, the librarian has never read this countervailing theory, which proves patrons are OTHERWISE ENGAGED.

UPDATE: As much as I wanted that to be a fascist librarian, it was just a fascist council member, which is so much more pedestrian. The poop still holds, though.

Posted by altehaggen in WTF @ 11:48 am | | Comments (5)

This completes the secret manuever in which literary bloggers, USING THE BRIGHT LIGHTS OF POLITICAL BLOGGERS TO DISTRACT THE MEDIA, take over book reviewing entirely!

We don’t know how we missed this (ummm, because we never read anything except Allure?) but Miss Lindsay of Lindsayism had her first book review in the New York Post a few days ago, spanking the sense out of Elizabeth Mackenzie’s Stop That Girl: A Novel in Stories*.

While well written, the book exists mainly to answer the question, “What if a life in which almost nothing ever happens was documented by a writer with an MFA in fiction?” Unfortunately, this question has already been answered many times, and the outcome is rarely positive.

Guess we’re going to have to ditch that novel we’ve been working on. Fuck! If you would like to contribute to the dissemination of more novels that should never have been published**, go below and give, you bastards.

* We’ve never understood this, “A Novel In Stories” shit. Why not “The Shirt That Smells Okay: A Hamper-Diving in Laundering” or “The Whopper: A Steak in Hamburgers”?
** No, we are not going to stop plugging until you give, you goddamned bastards.

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ 11:27 am | | Comments (5)

If nothing else, think how your donation will bring us one click closer to getting rid of this ugly button

Due to popular demand, we set up a PayPal address for you to send donations to keep The Book Thing of Baltimore alive with one click, you lazy bastards. Hit that button on the right, and your smallest or biggest donation — which is very, very welcome! — will help us reach our goal of a down payment on our new building. You’ve got about fifty more days of hearing about this once a week, by the way, so you might as well give up and give now. If you are suspicious, happy to spend ten minutes registering and think we’re buying Manolos with your hard-earned sawbucks, read our original plea below and give at Network For Good.

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ Tuesday, February 22, 2005 6:00 pm | | Comments (2)

Mind The Gap

Not a day goes by that we don’t ask ourselves, What the hell happened to Stacey Richter, the author of the marvelous My Date With Satan, so often and so unjustly coupled with the decidedly mediocre The Woman Who Cut Off Her Leg At The Maidstone Club? Well, we finally have our answer. The debut issue of the D.C. based Barrelhouse Magazine features new fiction from Richter, as well as some crap from Steve Almond and an interview with Emmylou Harris. We are very very excited, but we also want to caution these boys that we were TOTALLY the captain of our high school volleyball team, and it’s all over for them.

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ 1:36 pm | | Comments (3)

Still, all Preps is good Preps

Preps Well, why should the NYT get the title of Curtis Sittenfeld’s Prep right? It’s not like they’ve ever written about it or anything.

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ Monday, February 21, 2005 10:59 am | | Comments (0)

Perhaps it’s just that God loves us, and doesn’t want us to spend $130 on a $5 strip of cotton

Thank you, Lucky magazine, for featuring the one skirt I’ve ever liked and making it FUCKING UNAVAILABLE EVERYWHERE.

Posted by altehaggen in Uncategorized @ Thursday, February 17, 2005 10:48 pm | Tags: | Comments (6)

Next page