We don’t know who you have to fuck to get a free copy, but we’re working on it

We know. We jest. We scoff. We make funny noises when we swallow. But it’s not just Alias Old Hag All The Time, people. We’re pleased to announce that our chapbook of poetry is forthcoming from Caketrain journal (hit “Press”) whenever they see fit to put Quark to paper.

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ Tuesday, November 30, 2004 4:48 pm | | Comments (31)

bloghosts [closed for business]

Our dumb hosting service is shutting down Jan 1. What this means for you, three readers, is that come the New Year, we will probably have to take a small hiatus if we can’t load up somewhere else in the meantime. Also, because apparently the owner (unconfirmed; salacious gossip) has skipped the country and is sipping cervezas with kufrs in some dirt-floor bar in South America, we will never get this domain name back and will have to switch again. We know this will reduce our readership to 1 and the occasional 2, because, seriously, how many times does a person want to switch? (What is this, Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice?) What can we say; we’re sorry. We wish there was some way to feed all the content automatically into a new site, but apparently this is akin to wishing all the ingredients for dinner would fly off the counters and arrange themselves into boeuf bourguignon and rosemary roasted potatoes.* **

* Are there dinners that can do this? Let us know.
** We’d like to point out that that title above IS NOT OURS. That’s the automatic slug of the page’s URL. Fuck fuck fuck.

Posted by altehaggen in WTF @ 12:32 pm | | Comments (10)

Kenneth, why have they fired me?

In 2001, Paul Limbert Allen solved the mystery of the Dan Rather “What is the Frequency, Kenneth?” beating, but was strangely unable to find true believers in his Barthelme theory. In an elegiac nod to Rather’s imminent departure, they’ve published it online:

I will never know what wrong Donald Barthelme perceived was done to him by Dan Rather during their mutual incubations in Houston. No one will ever know. It will have to be the one unknown that haunts our generation as we ponder the Rather/Barthelme connection with the incident on Park Avenue. But there are at least two well-dressed white men out there (now in their fifties) who know the complete truth. Did Barthelme know what they were doing? Or were the avengers acting on their own, loose cannons armed with quotes from Barthelme’s canon?

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ 11:43 am | | Comments (0)

Or should we hang out in those back-bend chairs, which actually look kind of cool?

We’re sure you’re all practically falling off the edges of your seats in anticipation of our next installment regarding our ongoing saga with chiropractic and the mystery thereof. For those of you that missed the first post, here’s the long version. We dropped a card in a coffee-shop card-drop FOR THE FIRST TIME and won what we thought was a massage. Actually it was a full workup and lecture series with a leading chiropractor around the corner from the coffee shop. On our first visit, we watched an instructional video, allowed ourselves to be irradiated against a wall and were told our spine looked something like a series of hooked devil horns rising to a withered desert pine. Tomorrow we go for the hydro-massage, which we like to envision as full immersion in an azure grotto attended by strapping, well-oiled eunuchs, but have been told is more like an inflated, inside-out condom you shudder in fully clothed. Anyway, on our first visit, the chiropractor told us that, were we to pooh-pooh the advice that we submit to his ministrations twice weekly, we would evolve into a stoop-shouldered, slouching mass barely recognizable as a human. Ever since then, we have experienced twinges and pains unimaginable, including violent stiffness of the neck and a tingling of the outer limbs. So even though he didn’t actually touch us or anything, can we still sue?

Posted by altehaggen in WTF @ Monday, November 29, 2004 5:44 pm | | Comments (1)

Elizabeth Bishop: the new Uggs

Slate, for some unknown reason, is churning out a bumper crop of pieces on poetry today. (So far: Anne Winters, Derek Walcott and Richard Wilbur.) If this hot new trend continues, we can expect Robert Pinsky to expire shortly after blowing 87 rails in the bathroom of Bungalow 8 any day now.

UPDATE: What is it called when you piggyback on the NYTBR’s scoop about an art form that has existed since the beginning of time? We don’t know, but Salon also has an interview with Sylvia Plath’s–obviously tortured –psychiatrist. [via the kind offices of LizPennakaDanaStevens]

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ 12:40 pm | | Comments (2)

We hope you feel better about your next trip to the DMV

Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, author of Purple Hibiscus, has written an editorial about getting your passport renewed in Nigeria:

When I finally get to the entrance, the Nigerian guard looks through my passport. He is upset that I travel to England often. “Why?” he asks. I want to tell him that he is working for the United States Embassy, not the British, and that his job is simply to make sure I have the right documents. But I say nothing. He puffs his shoulders and grunts with self-importance. “Passport photos?” he asks.

I hand them to him.

“Use your right hand!” he says.

I transfer my files to my left hand and then hand him the photos with my right. He notices they are the same photos I have used in my British visa. “Get back!” he says. “Go and take another picture and come back! You cannot wear the same dress in two passports!”

I come back the next day, with new photos in which I look ridiculous because the photographer - his signboard said, “Expert in American Visa Passport Photos”- stuck little balls of paper behind my ears. The Americans want to make sure your ears show, he told me. He didn’t listen when I said that my ears don’t need to stick out like lettuce leaves, that the Americans simply don’t want your hair to cover your ears.

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ 12:13 pm | | Comments (0)

Get your pretentious American actors straight

Okay, so we only scored five out of ten on this Guardian books-into-films quiz. But it’s Ethan HAWKE, not Ethan HAWKES, you limey bastards.

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ 10:45 am | | Comments (1)

We’re all for indulging the dead, especially if it involves graveside bukkake

Sometimes people are dead, but they still have things to say. Witness this dispatch from He-Who-Prefers-Not-To-Be-Named,-Actually,-Thanks:

Doughy-faced scribbler Jonathan Franzen takes approximately 7,500 words of this week’s New Yorker to continue the ongoing memoir-cum-therapy-session which editors of that fine periodical have been complicit in enabling over the last few of years. He also mentions a couple of things about Charlie Brown (given the latter’s moon-shaped visage, a little self-identification by the former makes sense). Now it’s all well and good for certain middlebrow publications to serve as safe havens in which their contributors can work out their deep-seated neuroses in full view, but, c’mon, this is The New Yorker: do they really need to go out of house? We’re sure Denby could crank out a masturbation monologue in a minute, if necessary. Well, at least there’s nothing about The Mekons in this one.

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ Monday, November 22, 2004 3:31 pm | | Comments (5)

Just worse drinking partners

Winning admission to an elite school is imagined to be a golden passport to success; for bright students, failing to do so is seen as a major life setback… Shirley Levin, of Rockville, Maryland, who has worked as a college-admissions consultant for twenty-three years, concurs: “Never have stress levels for high school students been so high about where they get in, or about the idea that if you don’t get into a glamour college, your life is somehow ruined.”

But what if the basis for all this stress and disappointment—the idea that getting into an elite college makes a big difference in life—is wrong? What if it turns out that going to the “highest ranked” school hardly matters at all?

We’ve always known two things: 1) If we’d gone to a high-pressure school like Exeter instead of one in which we could hang around reading Sinclair Lewis all day because the calculus homework was kind of easy, we never would have been able to handle the pressure, and 2) being too delicate to handle the pressure would have made us a rather mediocre student, and thus 3) we never would have gotten into the type of fancy-pants school we eventually attended. (See, that was actually three things. Case in point.)

Because, the older and more decrepit we grow, the more it seems STRIKINGLY clear that the vast majority of those who attended what the more imperious inhabitants of New Haven and Cambridge would have generally regarded as a dumbass school seem pretty much the same at getting good jobs, acquiring houses, spouses and children, eating and drinking regularly, and garnering fame and money for themselves — even lawyers and guns if required. (It goes without saying that, as drinking partners, they are actually far better at not being irritating and always dropping hints about “New Haven” and “Cambridge” and stuff.) Which is to say, if you are a young, nervous parent, or if you are an old, insecure drinker who hates drinking with certain people, you should read October’s Atlantic roundup of college-admission idiocy. It says Ivy League grads are as dumb as you are. [Bugmenot required.]

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ 1:58 pm | | Comments (3)

It is, as God is our witness, the ONLY good thing to ever come from Language Poetry

We can’t improve on Beatrice’s assessment of David Orr’s review in this week’s NYTBR, so we’ll just post it completely:

It’s hard to be 100 percent objective about David Orr’s review of The Best American Poetry 2004, since Beatrice owes about half of its current audience to Orr’s positive appraisal of this blog for NYTBR in October. Having made that disclosure, it’s damn near about the most perfect review I’ve read in a long time, laying out the longstanding critical controversies surrounding the Best American Poetry series and the merits and flaws of the poems in this year’s edition in a clear, orderly fashion that continually relates the issues raised to the text under consideration. If you don’t know much about poetry, you’ll feel honestly educated after reading this piece.

Posted by altehaggen in Lit-ish @ 12:33 pm | | Comments (0)

Next page